Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Third edge homomorphism

PDF p. 17: Corollary6.9 supported factor calculation

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let k be a field and let X be a Noetherian k-scheme of Krull dimension 3. Write Fmot3K(X) for the third stage of the decreasing motivic filtration of the nonconnective K-theory spectrum of perfect complexes, and K0(X)=π0K(X). Its third image-filtration group is the subgroup Fmot3K0(X)=im⁡(π0Fmot3K(X)⟶K0(X)). The arrow is induced by the transition from stage three to stage zero, identified with K(X). Let p3 be the isomorphism from π0Fmot3K(X) to Hmot6,3(X,Z)=H6(Z(3)mot(X)) induced by the canonical map to the third graded cofiber and the specified graded comparison, as in Third-stage graded isomorphism. Here π0 denotes the zeroth stable homotopy group, and H6 is degree-six cohomology of the weight-three motivic complex.

The third edge homomorphism is the composite ϵ3:Hmot6,3(X,Z)→ p3−1 π0Fmot3K(X)⟶Fmot3K0(X). The second arrow is the stage-to-K0 homomorphism with its codomain restricted to its image. In particular, ϵ3 is surjective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field k, and a Noetherian k-scheme X of Krull dimension 3.

Goal: Justify the definition of ϵ3 and its surjectivity.

[F1]

Under these hypotheses, Third-stage graded isomorphism supplies the actual third-stage projection p3 as an isomorphism with the displayed motivic cohomology group. It does not assert that the stage-to-K0 map is injective.

[F2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, Motivic filtration and image groups supplies the filtration and defines Fmot3K0(X) as the image of the stage-to-K0 homomorphism; that homomorphism is surjective onto its image.

Justification

1.1 The hypotheses in [F1] hold for the given X, so p3 has a unique inverse homomorphism from Hmot6,3(X,Z) to π0Fmot3K(X). [F1, given]

2.1 By [F2], the second arrow in the displayed composite is a well-defined surjective homomorphism onto the stated image subgroup. Composing it with the inverse from step 1.1 defines ϵ3. [F2, step 1.1]

3.1 For any element of the image subgroup, choose a preimage under the second arrow and apply p3 to it. The resulting motivic cohomology class maps to the chosen element under ϵ3. Thus ϵ3 is surjective. No injectivity of the stage-to-K0 map is needed for this conclusion. [F1, F2, step 2.1] ∎

Depends on

Used by · 7

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · PDF p. 13, immediately before Proposition 6.1

The third edge homomorphism is the inverse of the third-stage projection followed by the map to the third image-filtration group; it is surjective.

Hypotheses: The construction occurs in the article’s Section 6 setting of normal threefolds over the standing field.

Reading limits: The displayed construction and its surrounding text were read in the supplied article extraction; the justification below uses the stated local supplier contracts.

Sources