Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Whitney identities and virtual Chern arithmetic

PDF p. 8: Actual Chern and Whitney identities; PDF p. 11: Total virtual Chern class

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the compatible universe and site-size bounds of the supplied motivic constructions. Let k be any field. For every qcqs X/k and exact sequence 0→V′→V→V′′→0 of finite locally free sheaves, ct(V)=ct(V′)ct(V′′). In particular ct(V⊕W)=ct(V)ct(W), c1(V⊕W)=c1(V)+c1(W) and c2(V⊕W)=c2(V)+c1(V)c1(W)+c2(W). A line has no higher classes, c1(L⊗M)=c1(L)+c1(M), and on a flag filtration all coefficients are elementary symmetric polynomials in its line roots. The resulting representative-independent virtual series satisfy ct(−W)=1−c1(W)t+(c1(W)2−c2(W))t2+(−c1(W)3+2c1(W)c2(W)−c3(W))t3+⋯. These statements concern Kvb0; only the completed affine comparison or locally Noetherian vector-bundle K0 convention may be used for further group identifications.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice as formulated in The Axiom of Choice and the stated size bounds. These discharge the foundational hypotheses of the supplied actual and virtual constructions [F1] and of the line comparison [F2] in steps 1.1–3.1.

[F1]

Actual exact-sequence Whitney and filtered-root formula on singular qcqs schemes supplies actual Whitney/filtered roots; Clopen rank extension and genuine representative independence extends to varying ranks and to the presented virtual group without using this proposition or the same-wave total-class definition.

[F2]

The source Chern classes are the supplied projective-relation classes, applied with S=Y=X under [A1], supplies line normalization and the actual additive orientation on every qcqs X/k. Formal Chern arithmetic through degree three supplies the formal product/inverse arithmetic.

Proof

Given: A field k, qcqs X/k, the stated bundles/filtrations/classes, and [A1].

Goal: Prove all actual and virtual formulas in their actual dependency order.

1.1A1F1

Apply [F1] first to actual bundles. The split sequence gives the direct-sum identity. The filtered formula identifies its coefficients with elementary symmetric polynomials in the actual line first classes. Varying ranks use the finite-clopen interpretation of [F1].

2.1A1F2step 1.1

Compare coefficients of t and t2 in the direct-sum polynomial, using commutativity of the even-degree coefficient ring, to obtain the two displayed formulas. The line assertions follow from [F2]; they use the original EM Picard map.

3.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

Only now use the virtual extension in [F1], which has already killed every exact-sequence relation. Its value at −[W] is the inverse of its actual value at W. Apply the recursive inverse formula of [F2] to get the displayed expansion through degree3 and its continuation as a formal series. No coefficientwise additivity of higher classes is inferred.

Depends on

Used by · 19

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources