Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Clopen rank extension and genuine representative independence

PDF p. 8: Actual Chern and Whitney identities; PDF p. 11: Total virtual Chern class

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the compatible universe and site-size bounds of the supplied motivic constructions. Let k be a field and X any qcqs k-scheme. For arbitrary finite locally free bundles on X, extend the supplied classes from constant-rank clopen strata by their unique finite-clopen gluing. The actual series are natural and satisfy Whitney for every exact sequence. Consequently they define a unique natural homomorphism ct:Kvb0(X)→1+∏i≥1H2i,i(X)ti with multiplicative-series target, and ct([V]−[W])=ct(V)ct(W)−1 independently of the representative. No identification of Kvb0 with perfect K0 on general schemes is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume The Axiom of Choice and the stated size bounds. These are inherited from the actual Whitney, motivic-class, derived-sheaf and virtual-extension constructions in [F1]–[F3] when invoked in steps 1.1–6.1. The finite common rank partition requires no additional arbitrary choice.

[F1]

Actual exact-sequence Whitney and filtered-root formula on singular qcqs schemes proves actual Whitney and root factorization at constant rank; Motivic Chern classes gives naturality.

[F2]

For every field k, the actual weight-j motivic complex, j≥0, is the restriction of a homotopy-coherent derived Nisnevich sheaf on qcqs schemes over the prime subfield. Elmanto–Morrow motivic complex input Finite clopen descent identifies such a sheaf with the product of its values on the pieces, including zero on the empty scheme. Derived Nisnevich descent on a finite clopen partition Cohomology commutes with finite derived products, and motivic cohomology is cohomology of the actual complexes. Finite derived products and motivic coefficient operations, Motivic complexes and cohomology

[F3]

Extending a Whitney class to K zero gives the unique extension precisely when the actual exact-sequence identity holds; Formal Chern arithmetic through degree three gives formal coefficient arithmetic.

Given: A field k, a qcqs k-scheme X, AC and the stated compatible universe and site-size bounds.

Goal: Close every hypothesis of virtual extension without circularity.

Proof

1.1givenconstruct

Each bundle has a locally constant rank function, so the common rank loci for a finite bundle family are pairwise disjoint open-and-closed subschemes covering X. Quasi-compactness gives a finite subcover, which contains every nonempty locus by disjointness. Each locus is quasi-compact because it is closed in X, and quasi-separated because it is open in X. Thus this is a finite clopen partition by qcqs k-schemes. For empty X use the empty partition.

2.1A1F2step 1.1

Let F be the prime subfield of k. Forgetting to F changes neither the underlying qcqs schemes nor the clopen cover and its fiber products. For every j≥0, [F2] therefore supplies the actual derived Nisnevich sheaf and applies finite-clopen descent to exactly this cover. It gives Z(j)mot(X)≃∏αZ(j)mot(Xα) by restriction. Taking cohomology and using finite-product compatibility in [F2] gives Ha,j(X)≅∏αHa,j(Xα) for every integer a. The same holds for every finite clopen refinement. Empty covers give the zero complex and zero groups. This argument imposes no algebraic-closure assumption.

3.1A1F1step 1.1step 2.1construct

For each i≥1, use the isomorphism of step 2.1 in bidegree (2i,i) to define ci as the unique class restricting to the constant-rank values from [F1]. Refinement leaves this class unchanged by uniqueness and naturality of those values. Use the unit for c0. For nonempty X the rank has a finite maximum, so coefficients above that maximum vanish by injectivity of restriction; on empty X all coefficient groups are zero and the series is the prescribed unit. Thus the actual series is a polynomial in every case.

4.1A1F1step 2.1step 3.1

Pullback refines the rank partition and preserves the constant-rank classes, hence preserves the glued classes by step 2.1. For an exact sequence, use a common rank partition. On each component apply actual Whitney [F1]; joint injectivity from step 2.1 gives the global identity coefficient by coefficient. The same argument preserves isomorphism invariance.

5.1A1F3step 4.1

All hypotheses of [F3] now hold. Its construction kills every exact-sequence relation in the presentation of Kvb0(X), so descends to a unique homomorphism. Its value on any difference is the stated quotient, with the inverse defined recursively in formal series, not by convergence. Two differences representing the same class have the same image because this is a map on the presented group. Its naturality also follows from [F3]. Thus this is genuine representative independence.

6.1A1F3step 5.1∎

The degree-zero series group is commutative because all coefficient first degrees are even. The product and inverse formulas through degree3 in [F3] therefore apply. In particular higher coefficients need not be additive, whereas c1 is additive on virtual sums and c2(x+y)=c2(x)+c1(x)c1(y)+c2(y).

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Elmanto and Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes, arXiv:2309.08463v1 · Theorem 1.1 opening, printed p. 3; prime-field convention, p. 2; Section 2.1, p. 11

For a prime field F and nonnegative weight j, the actual motivic complex is a finitary Nisnevich sheaf on qcqs F-schemes valued in D(Z).

Hypotheses: F is Q or F_p; the schemes are qcqs; j is nonnegative.

Reading limits: This proposal read the primary v1 PDF text extraction at the prime-field convention, opening of Theorem 1.1, and Section 2.1. No visual scan inspection or reconstruction of the Section 4 construction is claimed. The named local derived-descent and finite-product proofs were read for their application below.

Sources