Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine bundles and finite projective modules

PDF p. 12: Serre splitting applied to virtual bundles

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a commutative ring A, associated sheaf and global sections restrict to quasi-inverse equivalences between finite projective A-modules and finite locally free OSpec⁡A-modules. These equivalences preserve rank, finite direct sums, tensor products and duals. Every short exact sequence of vector bundles on an affine scheme splits.

Here a finite projective module is a finitely generated module P with the lifting property for maps from P through surjective module homomorphisms. A vector bundle means a finite locally free sheaf: each point has a neighbourhood on which it is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of copies of the structure sheaf. Its rank at a point is the number of copies there; the published definition establishes that this number is well-defined. The rank of a finite projective module at a prime p is the rank of its free localization Pp. The duals are P∨=Hom⁡A(P,A) and E∨=HomOX(E,OX).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring A, X=Spec⁡A, and the Axiom of Choice.

Goal: Establish the stated restricted equivalence, compatibility with the indicated operations, and splitting.

[F1]

Associated sheaf and global sections are quasi-inverse equivalences between A-modules and quasi-coherent sheaves on X; finite locally free sheaves are quasi-coherent (Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules, Locally free sheaves of finite rank).

[F2]

The sets D(f)={p:f∉p} form a basis; X is compact. A finite family D(fi) covers X exactly when the fi generate the unit ideal. The same holds for any fixed positive powers of the fi (The underlying space of an affine spectrum, The prime spectrum is compact in the library's non-Hausdorff sense, Distinguished-subset covers detect radicals).

[F3]

For an A-module M, the sections of M~ on D(f) are Mf, naturally in M, and its stalk at p is Mp (Sections of the associated sheaf on basic opens, The stalk of an associated sheaf is the localisation).

[F4]

A projective module is a direct summand of a free module, and a short exact sequence with projective quotient splits. Under AC, a direct summand of a free module is projective (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules, The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct; use finite principal covers and clear denominators
1.1F2F4assume-hyp

First suppose X is empty. Under AC a nonzero commutative ring has a prime ideal, so A=0. The only A-module and the only sheaf of modules on X are zero; all assertions, including the empty rank function, follow. Hence assume X is nonempty below.

2.1F2constructstep 1.1

We record a finite-generation patching argument. If an A-module M has Mfi finitely generated for a finite principal cover, choose finitely many elements of M whose images generate each Mfi: clear the denominators of local generators. Let N be the submodule they generate. For any m∈M, each m/1 lies in Nfi, so some power finim lies in N. By [F2] suitable coefficients give 1=∑iaifini, whence m=∑iaifinim∈N. Thus M is finitely generated.

3.1step 2.1construct

If, in addition, each Mfi is finite free, choose a surjection q:An→M using step 2.1 and put K=ker⁡q. Localization is exact: fractions representing a relation become actual relations after multiplication by a denominator, and the same argument detects zero fractions. Hence Kfi=ker⁡(qfi). Since the free module Mfi admits lifts of its finitely many basis vectors through qfi, this localized surjection splits; consequently Kfi is a direct summand of Afin and is finitely generated by the projections of the standard basis. Step 2.1 applied to K shows that K is finitely generated. Thus M is finitely presented: there is an exact sequence Am→An→qM→0 with m,n finite.

4.1step 3.1construct

A finite presentation also permits clearing denominators of maps: for any A-module N and f∈A, every Af-linear map Mf→Nf is f−ksf for some k≥0 and A-linear map s:M→N. Indeed choose images in N for the finitely many generators after clearing a common denominator; the finitely many relations vanish after localization, so multiplying all chosen images by one further power of f makes every relation vanish in N. The resulting assignment defines s. Moreover, if a map from the finitely generated module M becomes zero after localization at f, a single power of f annihilates that map: take a common power killing the images of its finite generating set.

5.1F2F4step 3.1step 4.1

For M as in step 3.1, the localized surjection qfi:Afin→Mfi has a section ti. By step 4.1, after multiplying ti by a power of fi it is the localization of an A-linear map si:M→An. Multiplying by a further power if necessary gives qsi=fiNiid⁡M as maps over A. Since the powers fiNi generate the unit ideal, choose ai with ∑iaifiNi=1. Then s=∑iaisi satisfies qs=id⁡M. Thus M is a direct summand of An, and is finite projective by [F4].

6.1F1F2F3step 3.1step 5.1

Let E be finite locally free. By [F1], E≅M~ for M=Γ(X,E). Refine its local free charts by distinguished opens and use compactness to obtain a finite cover D(fi) on which E≅Ori. By [F3], Mfi≅Afiri. Steps 3.1 and 5.1 show that M is finite projective, including the finite-presentation assertion needed for the restriction of the equivalence.

7.1F2F3F4constructstep 6.1

Conversely, let P be finite projective. A finite generating surjection An→P splits by its lifting property, so P is the image of an idempotent matrix e on An. At a prime p, the reduction of e over the residue field is an idempotent and therefore has a basis in which it is diag⁡(Ir,0). Lift that change-of-basis matrix to Ap; its determinant is a unit there, hence it is invertible. After this change of basis, the upper-left r×r block of e is invertible at p. Shrinking to a principal neighbourhood of p makes both matrices invertible. Elementary block row and column operations then identify the image of e with the direct sum of a free rank-r module and the image of an idempotent matrix d whose entries vanish modulo p. More explicitly, the image and kernel of e split the ambient module; the invertible upper-left block gives a rank-r free summand of the image and reduces the remaining idempotent to zero modulo p. The determinant of I−d is therefore outside p; after a further principal shrinking it is invertible. Since d(I−d)=0, this forces d=0 there. Hence Pf≅Afr on a principal neighbourhood of each prime. By [F3], P~ is finite locally free.

8.1F1F3step 6.1step 7.1

Steps 6.1 and 7.1 show that the quasi-inverse functors of [F1] take precisely the stated subcategories into one another, so their unit and counit restrict to a quasi-inverse equivalence. The localization Pp is free by step 7.1, and [F3] identifies it with the stalk of P~; therefore its rank agrees with the bundle rank in the published definition. This also makes the module rank well-defined.

9.1F1F3step 3.1step 4.1step 7.1step 8.1

For finite projective P,Q, the canonical sheaf maps P~⊕Q~→P⊕Q~, P~⊗Q~→P⊗AQ~, and P∨~→Hom(P~,OX) are isomorphisms. Indeed, use a common principal cover on which P and Q are finite free; on each member these maps are the standard finite-free identifications, including Hom⁡Af(Afr,Af)≅Afr. For the dual, the identification (P∨)f≅Hom⁡Af(Pf,Af) follows either from the finite presentation in step 3.1 and clearing denominators as in step 4.1, or from the finite free-summand representation of P. Isomorphism of sheaf maps is local. The inverse equivalence consequently preserves the same operations up to their canonical isomorphisms.

10.1F1F3F4step 6.1step 9.1

Let 0→E′→E→E′′→0 be a short exact sequence of vector bundles on X. By [F1] write it as associated sheaves of module maps P′→P→qP′′. Localization identifies their stalks with the localizations of these maps by [F3]. Exactness at all stalks implies exactness of 0→P′→P→P′′→0: a module whose localization at every prime is zero is zero, since a nonzero element has a proper annihilator contained in a prime. Apply this to the kernel, homology and cokernel, using exactness of localization. By step 6.1, P′′ is projective; [F4] gives a section of q. Its associated sheaf is a section of E→E′′, and the original sequence splits.

11.1F1F2F4step 8.1step 9.1step 10.1∎

Steps 8.1, 9.1 and 10.1 prove all assertions. AC is used through the cited affine equivalence, compactness and prime-ideal consequences, and the cited projective-module characterization.

Depends on

Used by · 18

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.