Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine bundle K zero is the projective split group

PDF p. 12: Bundle classes in spectral K zero

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a commutative unital ring A and X=Spec⁡A, associated sheaf induces an isomorphism from the split Grothendieck group of finitely generated projective A-modules to the vector-bundle Grothendieck group of X.

A finitely generated projective module is a finitely generated module with the lifting property through surjective module maps. A vector bundle is a locally finite free OX-module. Its Grothendieck group is generated by isomorphism classes [E], with [E]=[E′]+[E′′] for every short exact sequence 0→E′→E→E′′→0 of vector bundles. The split group has only the corresponding direct-sum relations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a commutative unital ring A, and X=Spec⁡A.

Goal: Compare the two stated group presentations.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, as required by the affine bundle–module equivalence in [F1]. No additional choice is used in the group-presentation argument. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Associated sheaf is an additive equivalence from finite projective modules to vector bundles on X, and every short exact sequence of these bundles splits. Affine bundles and finite projective modules

[F2]

An additive equivalence induces an isomorphism on split Grothendieck groups. Additive equivalences preserve split K zero

Proof

technique · Split the exact-sequence relations and transport the presentation
1.1A1F1construct

Every direct sum E′⊕E′′ gives a split short exact sequence, so each split relation is an exact-sequence relation. Conversely, by [F1] under [A1], any short exact sequence of vector bundles identifies its middle term with E′⊕E′′, so its relation is a split relation. The two relation subgroups coincide.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1∎

The associated-sheaf equivalence in [F1] induces an isomorphism of split groups by [F2]. Composing with the identification in step 1.1 gives the stated isomorphism, carrying [P] to [P~].

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.