How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projectivity and rank of a free-summand complement
PDF p. 1: Serre splitting theorem
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a finite projective module of constant rank over a nonzero commutative ring . If , then is finite projective of constant rank , and the associated bundles satisfy . Constant rank means that every prime localization is free of the specified rank.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , , the decomposition, and the Axiom of Choice as in the statement.
Goal: Establish finite projectivity, rank, and the associated bundle decomposition.
Under Choice, the affine bundle–module correspondence preserves direct sums and rank, and finite projective modules correspond to vector bundles. Affine bundles and finite projective modules
Proof
The projection of a finite generating set of generates . A direct summand of a projective module is projective: to lift a map from through a surjection, precompose it with the projection , lift from , and restrict to . Hence is finite projective.
By [F1], , where , and is a vector bundle. At any prime, taking residue-field fibers of this decomposition gives . The rank correspondence in [F1] gives rank at every prime.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.