How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Free stabilization passes through global sections
Statement
Assume AC and put . For bundles and an integer , if and only if . All modules here are finite projective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses in the statement.
Goal: Establish the stated conclusion.
The affine equivalence preserves finite direct sums and sends to . Affine bundles and finite projective modules
It reflects and preserves isomorphism classes. Affine bundle classes are actual projective-module classes
Proof
Apply global sections to a stabilized bundle isomorphism. Its inverse remains an inverse; direct-sum compatibility identifies its source and target with the displayed modules.
Conversely sheafify a module isomorphism and use the counit to identify its ends with the displayed bundles. The equivalence also supplies finite projectivity.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.