Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local ranks in the affine bundle correspondence

PDF p. 1: Serre splitting theorem

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. If E is a rank-r vector bundle on X=Spec⁡A and P=Γ(X,E), then P is finite projective and Pp is free of rank r over Ap for every prime p. A vector bundle is a finite locally free sheaf, and rank r means that its local free rank is r at every point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative unital ring A, a rank-r vector bundle E on Spec⁡A, and the Axiom of Choice.

Goal: Identify the projectivity and local ranks of P=Γ(X,E).

[F1]

The affine bundle–module equivalence preserves rank and identifies the stalk of the associated sheaf at p with the localization of the module. Affine bundles and finite projective modules

Proof

1.1F1given

By the affine equivalence, P is finite projective and its associated sheaf is isomorphic to E.

2.1F1givenstep 1.1∎

At each prime, the stalk of E is free of rank r over the local ring Ap by the definition of rank. The stalk identification in [F1] therefore gives Pp≅Apr.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.