Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-generatedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Support fibers with explicit cohomological indexing

PDF p. 6: Definition 2.7 support indices

Definition

Let X be a scheme, T⊆X a closed subset, and U=X∖T its open complement. Fix an integer j and a restriction map f:Cj(X)→Cj(U) of cochain complexes of abelian groups. A cochain complex A consists of abelian groups An and homomorphisms dA:An→An+1 with dA2=0; its cohomology is Hn(A)=ker⁡(dA:An→An+1)/im⁡(dA:An−1→An). A restriction map here means a cochain map: df=fd.

Define the support complex Cj,T(X) to be the homotopy fiber of f. Explicitly, for A=Cj(X) and B=Cj(U), one model has Cj,T(X)n=An⊕Bn−1,d(a,b)=(dAa, f(a)−dBb). The projection (a,b)↦a is the support-to-global map. Define the supported cohomology group by HTa,j(X)=Ha(Cj,T(X)). For complexes represented only in the derived category, use a cochain-map representative of the restriction morphism and take the resulting derived isomorphism class of this fiber. In particular, derived sections may provide the complexes and restriction map when the site, size and choice hypotheses in Derived global sections on a scheme site and the required restriction data are supplied.

Write HCj,T(X) for the Eilenberg–Mac Lane spectral realization specified in Complex shifts and spectral homotopy indices, and write [2j] for suspension of a spectrum by 2j. For every integer i the indexing conventions are πiHCj,T(X)≅HT−i,j(X),πi(HCj,T(X)[2j])≅HT2j−i,j(X). The two spectra in these formulas are distinguished: the second is shifted and the first is not. This auxiliary convention does not identify either spectrum with the article's support object without a separately specified comparison. The article's printed Definition 2.7 formula is retained separately in its article item.

Justification

The displayed differential squares to zero because dA2=dB2=0 and fdA=dBf; the projection to A commutes with differentials. This complex is the mapping cone of f shifted by −1, with the displayed sign convention, and hence models the homotopy fiber. A commutative square of cochain maps induces a map of these models. If both vertical maps in such a square are quasi-isomorphisms, the induced map on fibers is a quasi-isomorphism: the short exact sequence of complexes 0→B[−1]→Cj,T(X)→A→0 gives a natural long exact cohomology sequence, and the five-lemma applied to its corresponding segments gives the assertion. Thus the construction depends only on the restriction morphism in the derived category up to isomorphism, and cohomology and the support-to-global map are well-defined there. The derived-sections application uses exactly the site, size and choice assumptions of Derived global sections on a scheme site.

Finally, Complex shifts and spectral homotopy indices applies to the unbounded cochain complex Cj,T(X) and gives both displayed natural group isomorphisms. It uses spectral suspension for the second formula; no comparison with the article's separately named object follows from indexing alone.

Depends on

Used by · 6

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.