Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-generatedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Derived global sections on a scheme site

PDF p. 4: Derived Nisnevich and cdh sections

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice and fixed universe size bounds. For each τ∈{Nis,cdh,et}, fix a small scheme site Cτ equipped with the indicated Nisnevich, cdh, or étale topology, and an object represented by the scheme X. The choice of site and topology is part of the data; these names alone do not identify a big site with a small one.

An abelian sheaf is a contravariant functor from the site to abelian groups whose underlying set-valued presheaf satisfies the sheaf condition. Let D(Ab⁡(Cτ)) be its unbounded derived category: complexes are localized at the chain maps inducing isomorphisms on all cohomology sheaves. For C in this category define RΓτ(X,C) as the right derived functor of evaluation at X, with value in the derived category D(Ab⁡) of complexes of abelian groups. Concretely, for a representative complex choose a quasi-isomorphism to a K-injective complex I∙ and take the derived-category class of I∙(X). K-injective means that every chain map from an acyclic complex to I∙ is chain-homotopic to zero. Set Hτn(X,C)=Hn(RΓτ(X,C)), where Hn is the kernel of the degree-n differential modulo the preceding image.

For an ordinary abelian sheaf F regarded as a complex concentrated in degree zero, Hτn(X,F)=0 for n<0. This convention does not assert a comparison between the three topologies or an identification between sheafification and derived localization.

Justification

The already stated Choice premise is inherited by the selected K-injective construction and its derived evaluation. The Axiom of Choice

The chosen site and object make evaluation meaningful, and the size bounds specify the ambient categories. Imported derived sections on a small site supplies the abelian category, existence and choice-independent derived-functor interpretation of K-injective evaluation, and a nonnegative injective resolution computing the value for F[0]. Applying Negative cohomology of a nonnegative evaluated complex to that resolution proves the negative-degree assertion. These inputs apply to each chosen topology separately; no comparison among them is used.

Depends on

Used by · 15

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.