How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The root map through derived sections, truncation and localization
PDF p. 6: Singular Beilinson–Lichtenbaum comparison
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and compatible universe bounds for the small étale sites, big sites, slices and products used below. Fix a prime , a field in which is invertible, and an element of multiplicative order . Put and . Let be the size-bounded category of qcqs -schemes with BEM's big cdh topology, generated by finite Nisnevich covers and finitely presented abstract blowup covers. Equip , the category of qcqs -schemes, with the induced topology. Let forget the structure map to , and let be restriction of presheaves. Write and for the respective ordinary reflective sheafifications of -valued presheaves, using derived Čech descent for covering families on both sites.
For , compute on the size-bounded small étale site of , with constant sheaf and Tate coefficient , where the tensor product is over . Write and . Their actual coefficient map on the slice is an equivalence . It induces a specified equivalence , namely the slice/ambient comparison followed by the localized inverse of . Here is objectwise cohomological truncation before sheafification.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice is assumed through the supplied K-injective construction of derived sections; the compatible universes contain the sites, slices and products. The Axiom of Choice and Derived global sections on a scheme site specify this assumption and its use. The actual big cdh slice over a field supplies the stated big site, slice and ordinary descent conventions.
A chosen root trivializes the actual Tate coefficient on the slice supplies the pullback-compatible coefficient isomorphism, and Derived global sections on a scheme site supplies derived sections as a functor.
Restriction to the slice commutes with big-site localization gives the actual unit-compatible slice comparison. Truncation is the standard derived functor retaining cohomology through degree three and killing higher degrees.
Proof
Given: The stated , ordinary localizations, Choice and compatible universe bounds.
Goal: Construct the displayed map without assuming a root on the ambient site.
Apply derived étale global sections to the coefficient isomorphism on each . Its inverse gives an inverse in , and pullback compatibility gives a natural transformation on the slice. Apply objectwise ; as a functor it preserves equivalences and the inverse. This is the specified map , induced by the coefficient map .
Use [F2] to identify with . Apply slice localization to the inverse map from step 1.1. Their composite is exactly the asserted equivalence, natural for -scheme pullbacks and compatible with the appropriate localization units. This applies the root map only after restriction and uses a proved interchange; it does not apply an ambient functor to a nonexistent ambient root transformation.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.