Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Restriction to the slice commutes with big-site localization

PDF p. 6: Singular Beilinson–Lichtenbaum comparison

Statement

With the sites and conventions of The actual big cdh slice over a field, there is a canonical natural equivalence j∗LCP≃LC/U(j∗P) for every complex-valued presheaf P. It identifies the restriction of the ambient localization unit with the slice localization unit. The same argument works for hyperdescent localization if that convention is chosen on both sites; no equivalence between ordinary and hypercomplete localization is needed here.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The actual big cdh slice over a field gives the actual sites and preservation of sheaves by j∗,j∗.

[F2]

Sheafification is the reflective localization of presheaves into sheaves: a map is a local equivalence precisely when mapping it into every sheaf gives an equivalence of mapping spaces.

Proof

Given: P on C.

Goal: Prove localization compatibility, including the actual units.

1.1F1construct

The formulas in [F1] give an adjunction j∗⊣j∗. Explicitly, a map j∗P→Q yields P(V)→P(V×SU)→Q(V×SU→U). In the other direction, evaluate P→j∗Q at V and restrict Q along the graph (id⁡,f):V→V×SU for each (V,f). Naturality and the projection–graph identities make these constructions inverse, coherently; equivalently the forgetful functor on scheme categories has right adjoint V↦V×SU, and the functor-category adjunction is the induced one. Hence this is an adjunction of mapping spaces, not just of isomorphism classes.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

If v:P→P′ is a local equivalence on C and Q is any slice sheaf, then j∗Q is a sheaf by [F1]. The adjunction gives Map⁡(j∗P′,Q)≃Map⁡(P′,j∗Q)≃Map⁡(P,j∗Q)≃Map⁡(j∗P,Q). Thus j∗v is a local equivalence.

3.1F1F2step 2.1∎

Apply this to the localization unit P→LCP. Its restriction is a local equivalence, and its target is a slice sheaf by [F1]. The universal property in [F2] identifies it with the slice localization unit. The resulting equivalence is canonical and natural in P, so it transports natural maps as well as objects. For hyperdescent, pullback preserves hypercovers and the same descent/adjunction argument applies verbatim.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.