How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Imported derived sections on a small site
PDF p. 4: Derived Nisnevich and cdh sections
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and fixed size bounds, and let be a small site with an object. The category of abelian sheaves on is abelian. Evaluation at has a right derived functor on the unbounded derived category, computed by evaluating a K-injective resolution. For a sheaf placed in degree zero, this derived value may also be computed by an injective resolution concentrated in nonnegative degrees.
An injective sheaf is an object such that maps into extend across monomorphisms. A quasi-isomorphism is a chain map inducing isomorphisms on all cohomology objects. A complex is K-injective if every chain map from an acyclic complex to it is chain-homotopic to zero. A K-injective resolution is a quasi-isomorphism into such a complex. The derived category is obtained from the category of complexes by formally inverting quasi-isomorphisms. A right derived functor here means the functor on that localization supplied by the cited construction.
External input
The cited Stacks results supply the abelian category, the unbounded K-injective resolution and derived-functor construction on a ringed site, and the ordinary nonnegative injective-resolution computation. Apply the ringed-site result to the constant integer sheaf: its modules are precisely abelian sheaves. These are imported established results, not locally reconstructed proofs. The hypotheses are a small site, the indicated size conventions and Choice; must be an object of the site. Lemma 13.31.4 applies to the nonnegative complex of injectives in this abelian category and identifies an ordinary injective resolution as a K-injective resolution. Thus its evaluation computes the same unbounded derived value. The foundational existence proofs remain imported.
Facts & Assumptions
Choice and the fixed size bounds are retained for the imported K-injective and ordinary injective-resolution existence constructions applied in step 2.1; their foundational proofs are not reconstructed here. The Axiom of Choice
Given: A small site , an object , Choice and fixed size bounds.
Goal: Obtain the stated derived-evaluation interface and its ordinary-sheaf computation.
The imported results in External input apply to abelian sheaves and to evaluation at an object. Scheme sites and sheafification
Evaluation is additive and left exact once the sheaf category is abelian. Evaluation preserves kernels
A bounded below complex of injectives in an abelian category is K-injective, by the imported Stacks Lemma 13.31.4.
Proof
By the imported abelian-sheaf result, the category is abelian. Its objects are exactly modules over the constant integer sheaf: integer multiplication is determined by the abelian group operation, and locally constant integer sections act locally by this multiplication and then glue uniquely by the sheaf condition. Evaluation is additive and left exact by [F2].
The imported unbounded result applied to this ringed site gives K-injective resolutions and the derived evaluation functor computed by evaluating them. For a sheaf in degree zero, the imported ordinary-sheaf construction gives an injective resolution starting in degree zero. Its terms are injective in the abelian category of step 1.1, and it is bounded below, so [F3] makes it K-injective. Consequently its evaluation computes this same right-derived functor on the sheaf.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Scheme sites and sheafification
- Evaluation preserves kernels
- The Stacks Project, Section 18.3: Abelian sheaves · Lemma 18.3.1(1)-(4)
- The Stacks Project, Section 21.19: Cohomology of unbounded complexes · Opening construction, additive-functor clause (2), and object-sections example (2), before Lemma 21.19.1
- The Stacks Project, Section 21.2: Cohomology of sheaves · Opening paragraph and equation 21.2.0.1
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 13.31.4: Bounded below injective complexes · Lemma 13.31.4, statement and one-line proof
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The category of abelian sheaves on a site is abelian.
Hypotheses: A site with the stated size conventions.
Reading limits: The stated lemma and kernel/cokernel descriptions were read; its proof was not independently reconstructed.
Every complex of modules on a ringed site has a K-injective resolution; an additive functor into an abelian category has a right derived functor computed on such a resolution.
Hypotheses: A ringed site with fixed size bounds and an additive functor to an abelian category; here use the constant integer sheaf and evaluation into abelian groups.
Reading limits: The existence and computation statements in the opening paragraphs were read; the underlying K-injective existence proof was not reconstructed.
Abelian sheaves on a site have enough injectives, and the cohomology over an object is computed by evaluating an injective resolution of the sheaf in degree zero.
Hypotheses: An abelian sheaf on a site with the fixed size bounds and an object of that site.
Reading limits: The injective-resolution definition for a sheaf was read; its underlying existence proof was not reconstructed.
A bounded below complex of injective objects in an abelian category is K-injective.
Hypotheses: An abelian category and a bounded below complex whose terms are injective objects.
Reading limits: Read the statement and its reduction to Lemmas 13.31.2 and 13.18.8; the latter's argument and the resolution-existence proofs were not reconstructed.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 18.3: Abelian sheaves · Lemma 18.3.1(1)-(4)
- The Stacks Project, Section 21.19: Cohomology of unbounded complexes · Opening construction, additive-functor clause (2), and object-sections example (2), before Lemma 21.19.1
- The Stacks Project, Section 21.2: Cohomology of sheaves · Opening paragraph and equation 21.2.0.1
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 13.31.4: Bounded below injective complexes · Lemma 13.31.4, statement and one-line proof