Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Evaluation preserves kernels

PDF p. 4: Derived Nisnevich and cdh sections

Statement

For an object U of a small site, evaluation F↦F(U) is additive and preserves kernels of morphisms of abelian sheaves. Consequently, once the category of abelian sheaves is known to be abelian, evaluation is left exact: it preserves exact sequences of the form 0→F′→F→F′′.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An object U of a small site.

Goal: Prove the stated properties of evaluation.

[F1]

Kernels of abelian sheaf morphisms are computed objectwise. Pointwise kernels of abelian sheaves

Proof

technique · Evaluate the kernel universal property
1.1F1given

Addition of morphisms of abelian sheaves is defined componentwise, so evaluation preserves sums and the zero morphism. By [F1], evaluating a kernel gives the kernel of the evaluated homomorphism.

2.1step 1.1assume-hyp∎

In an abelian category, exactness of 0→F′→F→F′′ means that F′→F identifies F′ with the kernel of F→F′′. Step 1.1 therefore gives exactness after evaluation in abelian groups.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.