How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Evaluation preserves chain homotopies
PDF p. 4: Derived Nisnevich and cdh sections
Statement
For an object of a small site, evaluation sends complexes of abelian sheaves and chain maps to complexes and chain maps of abelian groups, and sends chain-homotopic maps to chain-homotopic maps. In particular it sends a chain-homotopy equivalence to a chain-homotopy equivalence.
A cochain complex has maps with . A chain homotopy from to consists of maps satisfying . A homotopy equivalence has a chain-map inverse up to such homotopies.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An object and complexes and maps as in the statement.
Goal: Prove preservation of complexes, homotopies and homotopy equivalences.
Evaluation is additive. Evaluation preserves kernels
Proof
Evaluation preserves composition, identities, sums and zero maps. Thus it carries and the chain-map equations to the corresponding equations of abelian groups.
Evaluating gives the homotopy identity for . Evaluating the two inverse-up-to-homotopy identities for a homotopy equivalence gives the final assertion.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.