How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Negative cohomology of a nonnegative evaluated complex
PDF p. 4: Derived Nisnevich and cdh sections
Statement
Let be a cochain complex of abelian sheaves on a small site with for . For every object and every , the cohomology group is zero. Here is the kernel of the degree- differential modulo the image of the preceding differential.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A site object and a complex vanishing in negative degrees.
Goal: Prove the negative-degree cohomology vanishes after evaluation.
Evaluation sends complexes of abelian sheaves to complexes of abelian groups. Evaluation preserves chain homotopies
Proof
For each , evaluation gives . Hence the kernel of the outgoing differential in degree is zero.
The quotient defining has zero numerator and is therefore zero.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.