Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Negative cohomology of a nonnegative evaluated complex

PDF p. 4: Derived Nisnevich and cdh sections

Statement

Let I∙ be a cochain complex of abelian sheaves on a small site with In=0 for n<0. For every object U and every n<0, the cohomology group Hn(I∙(U)) is zero. Here Hn is the kernel of the degree-n differential modulo the image of the preceding differential.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A site object U and a complex I∙ vanishing in negative degrees.

Goal: Prove the negative-degree cohomology vanishes after evaluation.

[F1]

Evaluation sends complexes of abelian sheaves to complexes of abelian groups. Evaluation preserves chain homotopies

Proof

technique · Inspect the terms in negative degrees
1.1F1given

For each n<0, evaluation gives In(U)=0. Hence the kernel of the outgoing differential in degree n is zero.

2.1step 1.1∎

The quotient defining Hn(I∙(U)) has zero numerator and is therefore zero.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.