Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Completely decomposed proper maps are abstract-blowup covers

PDF p. 10: Lemma 5.1, weight-zero restriction; PDF p. 5: Lemma 2.4, finite-type cdh topology

Statement

Let k be a field. On the category of separated finite-type k-schemes let J be the topology generated by Nisnevich covering families and abstract blowup families whose proper map is an actual isomorphism on the open complement of the closed center. Every completely decomposed proper morphism is a J-cover. Consequently J is the cdh topology generated by Nisnevich covering families and singleton completely decomposed proper morphisms. No reducedness hypothesis on the schemes is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field, category and generated topology in the statement, and a completely decomposed proper morphism p:Y→X.

Goal: Prove the reverse generation implication with actual open-complement isomorphisms.

[F1]

The meanings of complete decomposition, properness, abstract blowup family and generated topology, and the fact that every actual abstract blowup family is a Nisnevich-plus-cdp cover, are supplied by Completely decomposed proper covers and the cdh topology, including its disjoint-union sieve justification.

[F2]

A proper birational map of integral finite-type k-schemes is an isomorphism over a dense open of its target, with its entire inverse image. Dense-open isomorphism for proper birational maps

[F3]

Finite-type schemes over a field are noetherian of finite dimension, with finitely many irreducible components. A closed subset missing all generic points has smaller dimension. A reduced zero-dimensional such scheme is a finite disjoint union of spectra of fields. These follow from the affine noetherian dimension statements; all closed immersions and finite-type maps here are finitely presented.

Proof

1.1F1F3construct

For every X, the reduction Xred→X is a J-cover: take the abstract blowup family with closed center Xred and proper member ∅. Both open complements are empty, so the required actual isomorphism holds. Properness and complete decomposition survive base change. For the latter, a residue-field lift over x base changes along x′→x to a κ(x′)-valued lift. Thus, once the assertion is proved for reduced targets, apply it to Y×XXred→Xred and then use local character along the reduction cover. It suffices to treat reduced targets.

1.2F1F3given

Prove the assertion for reduced targets by induction on d=dim⁡X. The empty case is immediate. If d=0, each of the finitely many field components of X has a residue-field-preserving lift in Y. These lifts define a section of p over each component and hence over X. A map with a section generates the maximal sieve and covers. This proves the base case.

1.3F1F2F3construct

For the induction step, for each generic point ηi of the reduced X choose a lift yi∈Y with κ(yi)=κ(ηi). Let Xi be the corresponding reduced irreducible component and Yi the reduced closure of yi in Y. The map Yi→X factors through Xi, since Yi is reduced and its image lies in that closed component. The induced map Yi→Xi is proper and birational: the closure is integral with generic residue field κ(yi), and it is closed in the proper X-scheme Y. Apply [F2] to each such map. After deleting component intersections and the finitely many closed complements of the resulting dense opens, there is an open U⊆X meeting every component such that Y′=∐iYi→X is an actual isomorphism over U. Let Z be the reduced closed complement of U. Then dim⁡Z<d and {Y′→X,Z→X} is an actual abstract blowup family.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

The base change Y×XZ→Z is completely decomposed proper and therefore covers by the induction hypothesis, since Z is reduced and has smaller dimension. For the sieve R generated by p, its pullback to Y′ is maximal because Y′→X factors through Y. Its pullback to Z is covering because it contains the covering sieve generated by Y×XZ→Z. Local character along the abstract blowup family in step 1.3 makes R covering. This proves the induction, and step 1.1 then supplies all nonreduced targets.

3.1F1step 2.1∎

Every generator of J covers for the Nisnevich-plus-cdp topology by [F1]; conversely every cdp generator covers for J by step 2.1, and the Nisnevich generators are common. Minimality of the two generated topologies proves equality. Only finitely many lifts and dense opens were selected in each finite-dimensional induction, so the local argument adds no arbitrary-index choice assumption.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources