How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dense-open isomorphism for proper birational maps
PDF p. 10: Lemma 5.1, weight-zero restriction; PDF p. 5: Lemma 2.4, finite-type cdh topology
Statement
Let be a field and let be a proper birational morphism between integral finite-type -schemes. Birational here means that the dominant map induces an isomorphism of function fields. There is a dense open subscheme such that the entire inverse image is an isomorphism.
External input
Import this specialization of Stacks Project, tag 0BAJ, using its reduced-target branch. The function-field convention is consistent with tag 0552. These established inputs are cited rather than reconstructed.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 1 level
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.
External dependencies
A proper birational morphism between integral finite-type schemes over a field is an isomorphism over a dense open of its target.
Hypotheses: Use the quasi-compact, locally finite type, reduced-target branch; both schemes have one irreducible component.
Reading limits: Read the complete statement and displayed proof of tag 0BAJ. The cited finite-morphism and birational-open lemmas were not reconstructed. The history endpoint was unavailable; no commit-specific version is claimed.
For integral schemes locally of finite type over a base, birationality is equivalent to an isomorphism of generic residue fields over their common base point.
Hypotheses: Here both schemes are integral and finite type over the field k; the isomorphism is induced by the given dominant morphism.
Reading limits: Read the complete statement and displayed proof to check the function-field convention. Its cited rational-map foundations were not reconstructed.
Sources
- Stacks Project, Generically finite morphisms · Tag 0BAJ, displayed Lemma 29.52.6; online text retrieved 2026-11-09
- Stacks Project, Birational morphisms · Tag 0552, displayed Lemma 29.51.7; online text retrieved 2026-11-09