How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flag detection over an arbitrary field by prime-field restriction
PDF p. 3: qcqs scheme conventions; PDF p. 11: Lemma 5.3 and Proposition 5.5: flag detection prerequisite; PDF p. 14: Lemma 6.4: lower-Chern comparison prerequisite
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed site-size and universe bounds of the actual motivic complexes. Let be any field and any qcqs -scheme. For finitely many finite locally free sheaves on , the simultaneous line-quotient flag tower , constructed on the finite common clopen rank partition, detects integral motivic cohomology: is injective for every and . No algebraic closure, finite-type, noetherian or dimension assumption is required. With the source zero extension in weights , detection in those weights is vacuous.
Facts & Assumptions
The prime-field complexes and their restrictions to field-schemes are homotopy-coherent derived Nisnevich sheaves, and cohomology is evaluated on these actual complexes. Elmanto–Morrow motivic complex input, Motivic complexes and cohomology
The actual projective-bundle equivalence for qcqs prime-field schemes has pullback as its zero summand. Its line-subbundle convention becomes the line-quotient convention by applying it to the dual bundle. External projective bundle input for the actual motivic complex
The simultaneous flag construction is a finite composite of positive-rank projective bundles on each common rank stratum. On qcqs the partition and its union are finite and qcqs. Flag towers with line-bundle quotients
Choice and the stated bounds are inherited through the flag construction and the derived sheaf evaluations. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Given: , the finite bundle family, Choice and the size bounds in the statement.
Goal: Supply detection in the arbitrary-field scope used by the actual second-stage comparison.
Let be the prime subfield. Forgetting to changes neither the underlying qcqs scheme, its vector bundles and projective bundles, nor the value of its restricted motivic complex in [F1]. For a positive constant-rank bundle , an invertible quotient of dualizes to a locally split line subbundle of , and dualizing again is inverse. Thus the source projective bundle for is the required quotient-projective bundle for , with the same tautological . Apply [F2] to . Projection onto the index-zero summand of the inverse equivalence is a left inverse to the actual quotient-projective pullback. Thus that pullback is injective on cohomology in every degree and nonnegative weight.
For constant ranks the tower in [F3] is finite. Applying step 1.1 at each stage and composing the injective homomorphisms proves detection for that tower. Rank-zero cases contribute the identity tower.
For varying ranks write for the finite clopen common rank partition and for its towers. Derived Nisnevich descent in [F1] for this disjoint open cover identifies the complexes on and with the finite products on their pieces; their empty intersections contribute zero, since derived sheaf descent for the empty cover gives the zero complex on the empty scheme. Taking cohomology commutes with these finite products. Therefore is the product of the injective maps of step 2.1 and is injective. The additional negative-weight assertion follows only from the expressly adopted zero extension.
Depends on
- External projective bundle input for the actual motivic complex
- Elmanto–Morrow motivic complex input
- Flag towers with line-bundle quotients
- Motivic complexes and cohomology
- The Axiom of Choice
- Elmanto–Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes, arXiv:2309.08463v1 · Theorem 1.1 opening, printed p. 3; Theorem 5.24(2), printed p. 43, preceding projectivization convention, and proof conclusion p. 44; negative-weight convention p. 34
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The prime-field motivic complexes are derived Nisnevich sheaves on qcqs schemes. The actual projective-bundle formula is an equivalence, with pullback the index-zero summand.
Hypotheses: Prime field Q or F_p, qcqs scheme, nonnegative weight, finite locally free bundle of constant positive rank. Source uses line subbundles; apply to the dual for the quotient convention.
Reading limits: This proposal read the primary arXiv v1 PDF extraction at Theorem 1.1 opening on printed p.3, the zero-extension convention before Theorem 5.3 on p.34, the projectivization convention and Theorem 5.24(2) on p.43, and its proof conclusion on p.44. Screenshot requests for pp.3 and 43 failed with cache misses; no visual reading is claimed. The current named supplier bodies and their applications were inspected. The deep motivic and projective-bundle foundations are imported, not reconstructed. Prior proposals are discovery aids without acceptance. Prime-field restriction, dualization and finite-clopen descent are local deductions supplied below.
Sources
- Elmanto–Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes, arXiv:2309.08463v1 · Theorem 1.1 opening, printed p. 3; Theorem 5.24(2), printed p. 43, preceding projectivization convention, and proof conclusion p. 44; negative-weight convention p. 34