How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flag towers with line-bundle quotients
PDF p. 8: Construction underlying Theorem 3.1
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a scheme and a vector bundle of constant rank . There is a finite tower , obtained by successively projectivizing the current positive-rank kernel in the line-quotient convention, such that has a filtration whose successive quotients are line bundles. Each inclusion is locally split. For take and the zero filtration. No global splitting of the extensions is asserted.
If is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, then is also quasi-compact and quasi-separated. For finitely many vector bundles, each of constant rank, their towers can be concatenated to obtain one such and a filtration for every pulled-back bundle. More generally, over a quasi-compact and quasi-separated , the same simultaneous conclusion holds for finitely many finite locally free bundles of possibly nonconstant rank, with a locally varying length of filtration: construct the tower separately on the finitely many open-and-closed common rank strata and take their finite disjoint union.
A vector bundle is a finite locally free -module; its rank is the number of basis elements on a local free chart. A line bundle is a locally free module of rank one. A filtration is locally split when each inclusion is locally the inclusion of a direct summand. A scheme is quasi-compact if every open cover has a finite subcover, and quasi-separated if the intersection of any two quasi-compact open subsets is quasi-compact. A common rank stratum is the subset on which every bundle in the given finite family has its prescribed rank.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a scheme , and the finite locally free bundles specified in the statement.
Goal: Construct the tower and locally split line-quotient filtrations, and prove the stated quasi-compactness and quasi-separatedness properties.
For a finite locally free bundle on a scheme , its projective bundle represents invertible quotients and has a tautological surjection onto a line bundle. Over a trivializing open for of positive rank , it is over that open. This supplier assumes the Axiom of Choice. Projective bundle represents line quotients
The kernel of a surjection of finite locally free modules is finite locally free; the surjection splits locally and the kernel rank is the difference of ranks. Kernels of surjections of vector bundles
Over an affine base, projective space has finitely many standard affine charts, and its diagonal over the base is a closed immersion. These constructions restrict over open base subschemes. Relative projective space from standard charts, The relative projective-space diagonal is closed
The Axiom of Choice supplies the choices inherited from [F1] and the selection of trivializing covers. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Set and . For , provided has rank , put with projection , and define as the kernel of the tautological surjection . By [F1], is a line bundle, and by [F2] is a vector bundle of rank and the resulting short exact sequence is locally split. Induction constructs all stages. The rank-zero bundle is zero. For no stage is taken.
Put and , with the identity map when . Pull every sequence of step 1.1 to along the composite of the subsequent projections. A locally split exact sequence remains split after pullback on the inverse images of its splitting neighbourhoods; consequently these pullbacks are exact and their kernels embed as locally direct summands. Write for the pullback of to , and for the pullback of . Then , , and is locally split, with a line bundle. Set . This gives the required filtration, with . Pullback preserves local freeness because it takes a local free basis to a local free basis.
We prove the topological assertion for one projective-bundle stage with quasi-compact and quasi-separated and of positive constant rank. Choose a finite affine cover of on which is free: refine a trivializing cover by affine opens and use quasi-compactness. By [F1] and [F3], each is covered by finitely many standard affine charts, so is quasi-compact.
Let and be two of those affine charts, lying over and . The intersection is quasi-compact because is quasi-separated; cover it by finitely many affine opens . The inverse images of in and are affine: each chart is affine over its base open, and the inverse image of an affine open under an affine morphism is affine. They are affine opens of . Their intersection is affine, since the diagonal of this projective space over the affine scheme is closed by [F3]: the intersection is its inverse image in the affine fibre product of the two affine opens, hence is a closed subscheme of an affine scheme. These finitely many intersections cover , so is quasi-compact. A scheme with a finite affine open cover whose pairwise intersections are quasi-compact is quasi-separated: any quasi-compact open is covered by finitely many principal affine opens inside the cover, and intersections of such opens are quasi-compact as principal opens in the quasi-compact pairwise chart intersections. Thus is quasi-separated.
Applying steps 3.1–4.1 successively to the finitely many stages in step 1.1 shows that is quasi-compact and quasi-separated whenever is. The rank-zero case is immediate because .
For a finite family of constant-rank bundles, first construct the tower for the first bundle, then pull the second bundle back to its top and construct its tower, and continue. Pullback of each previously constructed locally split filtration remains a locally split filtration with line-bundle quotients, by the argument of step 2.1. The concatenation is finite, and step 5.1 applies at every stage when the initial scheme is quasi-compact and quasi-separated.
For a finite family with locally varying ranks on a quasi-compact quasi-separated , each rank function is locally constant: a local free chart has a fixed number of basis elements. Hence every common rank stratum is open, its complement is the union of the other open strata, and it is therefore also closed. The common strata form an open cover of ; quasi-compactness makes the set of nonempty strata finite. Each is quasi-compact as a closed subset of and quasi-separated as an open subscheme: intersections of its quasi-compact opens are intersections in . Apply step 6.1 on each stratum and take the finite disjoint union of the resulting towers and maps. The filtrations have constant length on each stratum, and their pullbacks give the claimed locally varying filtrations. The finite disjoint union is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, since intersections between distinct components are empty and the same properties hold within each component.
Steps 1.1–2.1 construct the flag tower and its line quotients; steps 5.1 and 6.1–7.1 prove the remaining claims. Only local splittings have been used, so no global direct-sum decomposition is claimed.
Depends on
Used by · 8
- Detection on a simultaneous flag tower
- Exterior-square line factors on a flag space
- Motivic splitting principle
- Finite clopen common rank strata
- Line-quotient classes across clopen rank strata
- The reduced universal bundle calculation identifies the second projection
- Actual second-stage comparison on every qcqs field-scheme
- Flag detection over an arbitrary field by prime-field restriction
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.