Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kernels of surjections of vector bundles

PDF p. 15: Kernel Q away from the finite zero set

Statement

Let X be a scheme and f:E→F a surjective morphism of finite locally free OX-modules. Then f splits locally and ker⁡f is finite locally free, with rank function rank⁡E−rank⁡F.

In particular, if E has constant rank r and s:E→OX is a morphism, let I=im⁡s⊆OX and let U=X∖V(I), where V(I) is the closed subset defined locally by the coefficients of s. Then ker⁡(s∣U)=(ker⁡s)∣U is a vector bundle of rank r−1 on U; if r=0, this assertion is understood on the empty set U.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

By Locally free sheaves of finite rank, a finite locally free module has, near each point, a finite free basis; its rank is independent of the chosen chart. A vector bundle here means a finite locally free OX-module.

Proof

Given: A scheme X and a surjection f:E→F as in the statement.

Goal: Construct local splittings and bases for the kernels, and apply the result to s on U.

1.1givenF1construct

Fix x∈X and trivialize E and F near x, of ranks n and m. Surjectivity on the stalk at x implies surjectivity of the induced map of vector spaces over the residue field κ(x). Its matrix therefore has an m×m minor nonzero at x; for m=0 use the empty minor, equal to 1. After shrinking around x, the corresponding determinant is a unit. Permuting the basis of E and applying the inverse of this minor to the chosen m columns gives a right inverse t:F→E on this neighbourhood. In particular m≤n.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

On that neighbourhood, E=ker⁡f⊕t(F): every e equals (e−tf(e))+tf(e), and the intersection is zero. More explicitly, the remaining n−m basis vectors, corrected by subtracting their images under tf, form a basis of ker⁡f; their independent coordinates in the unselected positions prove independence and the displayed decomposition proves spanning. Thus the kernel is finite locally free of rank n−m, and t is the required local splitting. Since x was arbitrary, the conclusion holds on X.

3.1givenF1step 2.1algebra∎

For s:E→OX, on a trivializing neighbourhood its image ideal is generated by the finitely many coefficients of s, so these local ideals define V(I). At each point of its complement at least one coefficient is a unit after shrinking; hence s∣U is surjective. Restriction to an open set preserves kernels, because kernels are computed sectionwise. Applying the preceding construction with target rank 1 proves the stated rank and local freeness. If r=0, I=0 and U is empty.

Depends on

Used by · 10

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.