How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Detection on a simultaneous flag tower
PDF p. 8: Computations after the splitting principle
Statement
Assume AC. Let be an additively oriented bigraded theory with the projective bundle contract on a scheme category . For a finite family of vector bundles of constant ranks on an object , the simultaneous flag tower induces injective pullback for every . Each in the Grothendieck group of vector bundles is the sum of the classes of its global line-bundle filtration quotients, with the empty sum for rank zero.
More generally let be qcqs and the ranks merely locally constant. Suppose the finitely many common rank strata , their inclusions, the component flag towers , their finite disjoint union , its component inclusions, and all belong to . If the joint restriction is injective for every bidegree, then is injective in every bidegree. This additional joint-restriction hypothesis is explicit: it is not part of the abstract projective bundle contract.
For the actual Elmanto-Morrow motivic theory of the article, on qcqs schemes over its field (algebraically closed unless otherwise specified), joint restriction to these strata is an isomorphism. Hence the componentwise flag tower detects for every , , and or , . This uses the actual derived motivic complexes and requires no smoothness, noetherianity, finite-type or dimension assumption. If the source's explicit extension for is adopted, the same statement holds for all integer weights, with zero groups in negative weights; the current nonnegative-weight definition alone makes no separate negative-weight assertion.
For varying ranks the line-quotient class equality holds separately on every . Globally it holds after extending those quotient bundles by zero along the clopen inclusions; these extensions are vector bundles of rank one on that component and zero elsewhere, rather than global line bundles. A finite sum of global line-bundle classes is asserted only in the constant-rank situation. Here denotes the group on finite locally free sheaves modulo short-exact-sequence relations. None of these statements asserts injectivity of on that group.
Consequently any equality between classes of the same cohomological bidegree whose two sides pull back naturally can be checked on the appropriate detecting tower: implies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the theory and category, and the bundles above; in the abstract varying-rank case also the explicit membership and joint-restriction assumptions. For the actual motivic application use the stated qcqs field, weight and coefficient hypotheses.
Goal: Preserve constant-rank detection, prove conditional abstract varying-rank detection, supply its actual motivic application, and state precisely the class equalities used.
The constant-rank simultaneous tower is a finite composite of positive-constant-rank projective bundles, with locally split line-quotient filtrations; it is qcqs over a qcqs base. Flag towers with line-bundle quotients
In the abstract contract, pullback along such a finite composite is injective in every bidegree; pullbacks are contravariantly functorial group homomorphisms. Projective bundle pullback detects cohomology classes, Bigraded cohomology and the projective bundle contract
The common rank partition and componentwise tower are finite and qcqs, with identity constructions at rank zero. Finite clopen common rank strata
The actual motivic complexes have finite-clopen product decomposition and hence joint cohomological restriction is an isomorphism, integrally and with finite coefficients, in their specified weights. Finite rank strata detect Elmanto-Morrow motivic cohomology, Motivic complexes and cohomology
The exact actual motivic projective-bundle equivalence and its rank/weight/convention hypotheses are imported separately. External projective bundle input for the actual motivic complex
Finite products commute with cohomology and the finite-coefficient cone. Finite derived products and motivic coefficient operations
Filtration relations give global line sums for constant ranks and componentwise line sums for varying ranks. Extension by zero along finite clopen inclusions gives the valid global vector-bundle class formula. Line-quotient classes across clopen rank strata
AC is inherited through the flag construction and is retained throughout. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
In the constant-rank abstract case, apply [F1] to the finite bundle family and [F2] to every stage. Their finite composite is injective in every integer bidegree; if there are no stages the map is the identity and remains injective.
Apply [F7] to the global locally split filtrations from [F1]. Telescoping the short-exact-sequence relations gives , with no summands for rank zero. This uses only those vector-bundle relations and asserts neither a globally split extension nor cohomological detection from a K-group equality.
In the abstract varying-rank case, let and be the inclusions. The construction satisfies . All the bundles on have constant ranks, so step 1.1 gives injectivity of each .
If , then functoriality gives . Step 3.1 yields for every . The stated joint-restriction hypothesis then implies . This proves conditional varying-rank detection without adding an unproved axiom to the abstract contract.
For the actual motivic theory, take one positive-constant-rank quotient-projective stage of a component tower. The source in [F5] uses line subbundles. Dualizing a locally split invertible quotient of the finite locally free gives a line subbundle of , and dualizing again recovers the quotient. Hence the represented projective bundles are canonically identified over , with the same projection and the source's dual tautological line equal to the quotient . Apply [F5] to , of the same positive constant rank. Its index-zero summand is and its map is precisely . The inverse of the derived equivalence followed by projection onto that summand is a retraction. Thus is injective on every integral cohomology degree , for .
Applying the finite-coefficient cone to that equivalence and using [F6] gives the same zero-summand retraction and injectivity for . Compose these injections through every finite component tower; identity stages at rank zero preserve the conclusion. Joint restriction to the common rank strata is injective by [F4]. The functorial argument of step 4.1 therefore proves the asserted actual motivic injectivity for both coefficient choices. The optional negative-weight convention gives zero source and target groups and so extends it trivially when that convention is explicitly used.
Finally [F7] gives all stated varying-rank class equalities, with supported extensions in the global formula, and explains why they cannot in general be called sums of global line-bundle classes. If in any of the detecting cases, functorial additive pullback gives , and the relevant injection from step 1.1, step 4.1 or step 6.1 implies . Naturality identifies pulled-back expressions with those formed from the pulled-back bundles, which proves the final identity-detection assertion and completes the proof.
Depends on
- Flag towers with line-bundle quotients
- Projective bundle pullback detects cohomology classes
- Bigraded cohomology and the projective bundle contract
- Motivic complexes and cohomology
- Finite clopen common rank strata
- Derived Nisnevich descent on a finite clopen partition
- Finite derived products and motivic coefficient operations
- Finite rank strata detect Elmanto-Morrow motivic cohomology
- Line-quotient classes across clopen rank strata
- External projective bundle input for the actual motivic complex
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by · 5
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.