Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The actual smooth open pair and its choice scope

PDF p. 13: Proposition 6.1 support argument

Statement

Assume AC. Let X be an affine finite-type threefold over algebraically closed k, let U=Xsmooth, and let T⊂X be closed with T⊂U. Put V=U∖T and W=X∖T. All four schemes are qcqs and U,V are smooth separated finite type over the perfect field k. They are regular Noetherian as schemes over the prime field. The two opens U,W cover X and their intersection is V, giving a Nisnevich two-open covering square. If T is an integral curve, it is affine; it lies in one of the open-and-closed relative-dimension strata of U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses in the statement, with the Axiom of Choice and fixed universe bounds.

Goal: Construct the stated actual maps and prove their consequence.

[F1]

Article scheme conventions, Motivic and filtered K theory with support and Nisnevich covers and distinguished squares fix the finite-type, size, AC and two-open conventions. Basic smoothness here includes its regularity over a perfect field and locally constant relative dimension.

Proof

1.1F1

Finite-type affine X/k is Noetherian and separated. Every open is quasi-compact in a Noetherian space, and its induced scheme is separated finite type. Thus the four objects lie in the completed qcqs category. The smooth locus and its open V are smooth over k, hence regular Noetherian. An algebraically closed field is perfect: in positive characteristic each polynomial tp−a has a root, so Frobenius is surjective; characteristic zero is perfect. Forgetting the map to k does not change regularity or Noetherianness.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

The inclusion T⊂U gives X=U∪W and U∩W=V. Open immersions are étale, and each point has a residue-preserving lift to one of these opens, so the family is Nisnevich. A closed subscheme of affine X is affine, giving the curve assertion. For a smooth morphism to a field the relative dimension is locally constant; the finitely many dimension strata of U are open and closed. The connected integral curve lies in one such stratum. These are component/dimension bookkeeping facts, with no new comparison theorem assumed.

Depends on

Used by · 4

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.