Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A coherent comparison of the particular open restriction

PDF p. 13: Proposition 6.1 support argument

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed site and universe bounds of the support and comparison constructions. Let k be an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic, let X be an affine finite-type k-scheme of Krull dimension three, and let T⊂X be a closed subset contained in the smooth locus U=Xsmooth of X→Spec⁡k. Equip T with its reduced induced structure, and put V=U∖T and W=X∖T. For the actual arrow V↪U, the weight-three motivic restriction diagram is equivalent to the actual cycle restriction diagram [Z(3)mot(U)→Z(3)mot(V)]≃[z3(U,∙)[−6]→z3(V,∙)[−6]]. It follows in particular that its H6 arrow is ordinary Chow restriction. The square is supplied before applying cohomology. In the cycle complexes, homological degree n is reindexed as cochain degree −n before the shift by −6.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses in the statement, with the Axiom of Choice and fixed universe bounds.

Goal: Construct the stated actual maps and prove their consequence.

[F3]

The assumed Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Choice, and the fixed size bounds discharge the inherited hypotheses of the geometry and comparison constructions. Their comparison maps are natural transformations on the stated diagrams.

Proof

1.1F1F3given

Under the stated Choice and size assumptions, the geometry lemma makes the specified U and V regular Noetherian schemes. Apply the natural regular comparison of [F1] to these two objects and their open arrow. This gives an equivalence of arrow diagrams from the motivic arrow to the cdh arrow. It applies although k need not be finitely generated over its prime field.

2.1F1F2step 1.1∎

Apply the open-natural classical interface of [F2] over the fixed perfect k. Compose the equivalences of diagrams, inverting only natural equivalences. Its bottom arrow is the actual open restriction on cycles. Taking H6 gives its degree-zero cycle homology arrow, which is ordinary Chow restriction by the completed degree-zero cycle supplier. This establishes the arrow identification before inferring any surjectivity.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.