How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A coherent comparison of the particular open restriction
PDF p. 13: Proposition 6.1 support argument
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed site and universe bounds of the support and comparison constructions. Let be an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic, let be an affine finite-type -scheme of Krull dimension three, and let be a closed subset contained in the smooth locus of . Equip with its reduced induced structure, and put and . For the actual arrow , the weight-three motivic restriction diagram is equivalent to the actual cycle restriction diagram It follows in particular that its arrow is ordinary Chow restriction. The square is supplied before applying cohomology. In the cycle complexes, homological degree is reindexed as cochain degree before the shift by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the statement, with the Axiom of Choice and fixed universe bounds.
Goal: Construct the stated actual maps and prove their consequence.
The assumed Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Choice, and the fixed size bounds discharge the inherited hypotheses of the geometry and comparison constructions. Their comparison maps are natural transformations on the stated diagrams.
Proof
Under the stated Choice and size assumptions, the geometry lemma makes the specified and regular Noetherian schemes. Apply the natural regular comparison of [F1] to these two objects and their open arrow. This gives an equivalence of arrow diagrams from the motivic arrow to the cdh arrow. It applies although k need not be finitely generated over its prime field.
Apply the open-natural classical interface of [F2] over the fixed perfect k. Compose the equivalences of diagrams, inverting only natural equivalences. Its bottom arrow is the actual open restriction on cycles. Taking gives its degree-zero cycle homology arrow, which is ordinary Chow restriction by the completed degree-zero cycle supplier. This establishes the arrow identification before inferring any surjectivity.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.