How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite derived quotients of rational complexes vanish
PDF p. 6: Finite-coefficient comparison
Statement
Let be an object of isomorphic to the underlying complex of a complex of -vector spaces, and let be an integer. Then is zero in . The derived tensor product is the total tensor product computed with a K-flat replacement; zero in means an acyclic complex.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and as stated.
Goal: Show .
Multiplication by is an isomorphism on the underlying complex of a complex of -vector spaces. Integer multiplication on rational complexes
The derived tensor product with is represented by the mapping cone of multiplication by . Its cohomology lies in the natural exact sequence of Derived finite coefficients and the Bockstein sequence.
Proof
Transporting [F1] across the given isomorphism shows that multiplication by induces an automorphism of every .
In [F2], both and therefore vanish. The exact sequence gives for every . Hence the derived quotient is zero.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.