How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational cofiber implies finite-coefficient equivalence
PDF p. 6: Finite-coefficient comparison
Statement
Let be a morphism in whose cofiber is isomorphic in to the underlying complex of a complex of -vector spaces. For every positive integer , is an isomorphism in , and consequently induces an isomorphism on for every integer .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and as stated.
Goal: Prove the finite-coefficient equivalence and its cohomological consequence.
A rational complex has zero derived quotient by . Finite derived quotients of rational complexes vanish
Taking the derived quotient by commutes with mapping cones. Derived finite coefficients preserve mapping cones
Proof
By [F1] and [F2], the mapping cone of is zero in , equivalently it is acyclic.
The long exact cohomology sequence of the mapping cone, obtained from the degreewise split sequence , shows that a chain map with acyclic cone induces an isomorphism on every cohomology group. Thus the finite-coefficient map is a quasi-isomorphism and hence an isomorphism in . Applying gives the stated group isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.