How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ideal-power dévissage and compatibility with coherent pushforward
PDF p. 15: Supported degree-zero dévissage
Statement
Assume AC and the fixed universe bounds. For as above, closed direct image induces a canonical isomorphism Its inverse sends to , with each quotient regarded as a coherent sheaf on . This sum is independent of and of the permitted filtration. Under forgetting support , the composite with is exactly coherent pushforward . The analogous square after the regular perfect comparisons into the specified spectral groups also commutes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the fixed universe bounds, and the coherent categories and and the finite ideal-power filtrations.
Goal: Check the abelian dévissage theorem and identify the actual support-to-global map.
Finite ideal-power filtrations and coherent sheaves on the closed subscheme supplies exactness, closure under subobjects/quotients and finite filtrations.
External degree-zero abelian dévissage gives the degree-zero isomorphism and inverse formula, including filtration independence.
Postnikov inverse and the specified nonconnective degree-zero group gives the natural supported/global comparisons with the specified nonconnective by object classes. Its construction uses the essentially small supported perfect category and its coherent heart. These same supplied models provide the essential-smallness premise used in step 1.1; that premise is not supplied by the ordinary ideal-filtration argument in [F1].
The already assumed The Axiom of Choice and fixed universes are used in step 1.1 to select equivalent small presentations and discharge the essentially-small abelian dévissage input [F2]. They are also retained when invoking the selected perfect-category realization and nonconnective comparison [F3] in steps 1.1–2.1. Computing the finite quotient sums requires no further choice.
Proof
Both categories are essentially small: in the supported perfect-category realization used by [F3], is the heart of the essentially small perfect category, and is equivalent to its full subcategory by [F1]. Choose equivalent small presentations under [A1]. The exactness, subobject/quotient closure and finite-filtration hypotheses of [F2] are supplied by [F1], and essential smallness was just checked. Thus exact inclusion induces an isomorphism. Precompose with the exact equivalence of [F1]. This is precisely , and its inverse is the displayed quotient sum by [F2]. The theorem’s independence statement also shows that any exponent which annihilates gives the same answer.
On a generator , sends it to in . Forgetting support sends this to the same coherent sheaf class in , which is the definition of closed coherent pushforward. Since the groups are generated by these classes, this proves the first square. By [F3], their images in the supported and global spectral groups are exactly the object classes of and the actual inclusion sends one to the other. Thus the square after the regular perfect comparisons also commutes.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.