Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External degree-zero abelian dévissage

PDF p. 15: Supported degree-zero dévissage

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let B⊆A be essentially small abelian categories, with B full, inclusion exact, and B closed under subobjects and quotients taken in A. Assume every object of A has a finite filtration whose quotients belong to B. The inclusion induces an isomorphism of Grothendieck groups G0(B)→∼G0(A). Here G0(A) is generated by isomorphism classes of objects with [M]=[M′]+[M′′] for every short exact sequence 0→M′→M→M′′→0. The inverse sends [M] to the sum of the classes of the quotients of any permitted finite filtration. This sum is independent of filtration and is additive in short exact sequences. Extension-closure of B inside A is not a hypothesis.

Source contract

Given: AC and the exact abelian inclusion and filtration hypotheses above, after choosing equivalent small presentations.

Goal: Import the established degree-zero filtration theorem and its inverse formula.

[F1] Weibel, The K-book, Dévissage Theorem II.6.3 with its proof supplies this exact assertion.

[A1] Choice is assumed in selecting equivalent small presentations and, on a small presentation, a permitted finite filtration for each object as in the source proof (The Axiom of Choice). Independence of these choices is part of [F1].

External input

Import [F1] with its full source record and actual reading limits. The proof uses common refinements of finite filtrations for independence and concatenates a subobject filtration with the inverse image of a quotient filtration for additivity. Geometric applications must separately construct any required ideal-power filtrations and check the categorical hypotheses; no comparison of K-theory spectra is implicit.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Charles A. Weibel, The K-book: An Introduction to Algebraic K-theory, Chapter II: The Grothendieck Group K_0 · §II.6, Dévissage Theorem 6.3, printed and PDF p. 50; proof on the same page

If B⊂A is an exact abelian full subcategory of small abelian categories, closed under subobjects and quotients in A, and every object of A has a finite filtration with quotients in B, inclusion induces K_0(B)≅K_0(A). The inverse sends an object to the sum of the classes of any such filtration quotients.

Hypotheses: B need not be extension-closed in A; exact inclusion, subobject/quotient closure and finite filtration are the actual hypotheses. Use equivalent small presentations of the essentially small coherent categories.

Reading limits: Read Theorem II.6.3 and its complete proof on printed and PDF p. 50 of the online Chapter II PDF at the cited URL, consulted 2026-11-10. The proof establishes filtration independence using equivalent refinements and additivity by concatenated filtrations. Its invoked common-refinement result (Exercise 6.2) was not independently reconstructed. This item imports the categorical theorem; it contains no geometric application or ideal-power filtration construction. No higher-K devissage theorem is imported.

Sources