How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External degree-zero abelian dévissage
PDF p. 15: Supported degree-zero dévissage
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be essentially small abelian categories, with full, inclusion exact, and closed under subobjects and quotients taken in . Assume every object of has a finite filtration whose quotients belong to . The inclusion induces an isomorphism of Grothendieck groups Here is generated by isomorphism classes of objects with for every short exact sequence . The inverse sends to the sum of the classes of the quotients of any permitted finite filtration. This sum is independent of filtration and is additive in short exact sequences. Extension-closure of inside is not a hypothesis.
Source contract
Given: AC and the exact abelian inclusion and filtration hypotheses above, after choosing equivalent small presentations.
Goal: Import the established degree-zero filtration theorem and its inverse formula.
[F1] Weibel, The K-book, Dévissage Theorem II.6.3 with its proof supplies this exact assertion.
[A1] Choice is assumed in selecting equivalent small presentations and, on a small presentation, a permitted finite filtration for each object as in the source proof (The Axiom of Choice). Independence of these choices is part of [F1].
External input
Import [F1] with its full source record and actual reading limits. The proof uses common refinements of finite filtrations for independence and concatenates a subobject filtration with the inverse image of a quotient filtration for additivity. Geometric applications must separately construct any required ideal-power filtrations and check the categorical hypotheses; no comparison of K-theory spectra is implicit.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
If B⊂A is an exact abelian full subcategory of small abelian categories, closed under subobjects and quotients in A, and every object of A has a finite filtration with quotients in B, inclusion induces K_0(B)≅K_0(A). The inverse sends an object to the sum of the classes of any such filtration quotients.
Hypotheses: B need not be extension-closed in A; exact inclusion, subobject/quotient closure and finite filtration are the actual hypotheses. Use equivalent small presentations of the essentially small coherent categories.
Reading limits: Read Theorem II.6.3 and its complete proof on printed and PDF p. 50 of the online Chapter II PDF at the cited URL, consulted 2026-11-10. The proof establishes filtration independence using equivalent refinements and additivity by concatenated filtrations. Its invoked common-refinement result (Exercise 6.2) was not independently reconstructed. This item imports the categorical theorem; it contains no geometric application or ideal-power filtration construction. No higher-K devissage theorem is imported.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, The K-book: An Introduction to Algebraic K-theory, Chapter II: The Grothendieck Group K_0 · §II.6, Dévissage Theorem 6.3, printed and PDF p. 50; proof on the same page