How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Characteristic-prime degree-five vanishing for singular affine threefolds
PDF p. 5: Proposition 2.6: torsion freeness
Statement
Let be an affine finite-type threefold over an algebraically closed field of characteristic . Then .
Facts & Assumptions
External canonical top-weight motivic-to-syntomic comparison supplies the canonical EM motivic-to-syntomic equivalence in weight .
Affine characteristic-p syntomic amplitude without regularity supplies the upper bound four for affine weight-three mod- syntomic cohomology.
Proof
Given: as stated, including singular and nonreduced .
Goal: Prove the exact mod- vanishing needed by Bockstein.
View as an -algebra. Evaluate [F1] on : . This is the comparison of the specified complexes, not an extrapolation of a degree- truncated comparison.
Take degree-five cohomology and apply [F2]. It is zero. No K-theoretic regularity or quasisyntomic assumption enters.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.