How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Top-weight degree-five vanishing away from the characteristic
PDF p. 5: Proposition 2.6: torsion freeness
Statement
Let be an affine finite-type scheme of dimension three over an algebraically closed field . If is invertible in , then .
Facts & Assumptions
External canonical top-weight motivic-to-syntomic comparison identifies the actual finite-coefficient motivic complex with syntomic cohomology in weight three, since ; at an invertible prime this is .
External affine étale vanishing at invertible primes gives affine étale vanishing above dimension.
Proof
Given: as stated.
Goal: Prove the vanishing for the supplied motivic theory.
The quotient in [F1] is the objectwise derived quotient used in Motivic complexes and cohomology, not a different finite-coefficient theory. Thus its degree-five cohomology is .
The twist is an étale -torsion local system; [F2] makes this group zero since . This does not require reduced or smooth.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.