Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Applying nonconnective K-theory to the enhanced interface

PDF p. 3: Nonconnective algebraic K theory: enhanced prerequisite interface

Statement

Assume AC and let X be qcqs. Applying the imported nonconnective functor 𝕂 to small equivalent models gives well-defined spectra 𝕂(Perf(X)) and 𝕂(Perf_T(X)) for every subset T. Exact derived pullbacks give coherent contravariance for qcqs schemes and their pairs. Tensor makes 𝕂(Perf(X)) an E∞ ring spectrum, makes 𝕂(Perf_T(X)) a unital module over it, and gives coherent mixed pairings 𝕂(Perf_T(X))∧𝕂(Perf_S(X))→𝕂(Perf_{T∩S}(X)). The supported spectra are not asserted to have a distinguished ring unit for proper T. These conclusions need neither a degree-zero identification nor a scheme localization theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: qcqs X, subsets T,S, morphisms between qcqs schemes and AC.

Goal: Justify exactly the K-theoretic operations needed by the definition.

[F1]

Essential smallness of perfect and supported categories supplies small stable idempotent-complete models.

[F2]

Coherent derived tensor and pullback on perfect complexes and Support ideals, mixed products and pullback supply coherent tensor, pullbacks, modules and mixed products, exact in each variable.

[F3]

External nonconnective lax symmetric monoidal K-theory gives the nonconnective functor on Cat_perf, the tensor universal property, and its lax symmetric monoidal structure. Stable spectra and exact triangles supplies the smash and all-integer group convention.

Proof

1.1F1F3

By [F1], the whole common-family diagram takes values in essentially small stable idempotent-complete infinity-categories. The inclusion of small models into this essentially small domain is fully faithful and essentially surjective, hence an equivalence of infinity-categories. Extend 𝕂 along this domain equivalence once, or equivalently compose the whole diagram with one inverse equivalence of domains. This gives a diagram of spectra and retains every coherence. Its different inverse choices are naturally equivalent. Thus no independent choice of a skeleton for each object or morphism is used, and the invariant is independent of enhanced presentation.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Apply 𝕂 to the exact pullbacks in [F2]. A functor preserves their identity and composition coherences, so these give contravariance on schemes and pairs. In particular the inclusion Perf_T(X)→Perf(X) induces the supported-to-ambient map of spectra.

2.2F2F3step 1.1

By the tensor universal property in [F3], each separately exact pairing of [F2] is an exact functor out of the corresponding Cat_perf tensor product. Compose its image under 𝕂 with the lax monoidal comparison 𝕂(C)∧𝕂(D)→𝕂(C⊗D). The coherent ambient product and unit make the ambient spectrum an E∞ ring, while the coherent module action makes the supported spectrum a module; the same construction gives the mixed pairings. Coherence follows from the supplied algebra/module operations and the lax symmetric monoidal functor, not merely binary maps in homotopy categories. No unit is inserted into the supported category.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

These steps only apply the invariant and its coherent products to exact functors. They do not identify π₀ with a separately defined Grothendieck group, identify negative groups by another construction, or prove that a particular scheme-support sequence is a localization sequence. Thus they establish precisely the stated interface.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.