Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Support ideals, mixed products and pullback

PDF p. 3: Nonconnective algebraic K theory: enhanced prerequisite interface

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and fix the universes of the common-family construction. Let X be a quasi-compact quasi-separated (qcqs) scheme, and use the common-family realizations of the supplied perfect fibers and their full supported subcategories. For any subsets T,S⊆X, derived tensor induces an exact-in-each-variable coherent pairing Perf⁡T(X)×Perf⁡S(X)→Perf⁡T∩S(X) and a coherent unital action Perf⁡(X)×Perf⁡T(X)→Perf⁡T(X). Thus Perf⁡T(X) is a stable tensor ideal and a module category over Perf⁡(X); no distinguished tensor unit in Perf⁡T(X) is asserted for proper T. For every morphism f:X→Y between qcqs schemes and every subset T⊆Y, Lf∗ takes Perf⁡T(Y) to Perf⁡f−1T(X), compatibly with the actions and pairings.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Qcqs schemes in the fixed universe, arbitrary support subsets, any morphism between these schemes, and AC.

Goal: Supply supported multiplicative and contravariant functors without adding a false unit.

[F1]

Coherent derived tensor and pullback on perfect complexes gives exact coherent tensor and pullback on the perfect fibers over qcqs schemes, using the same common family.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed through the common-family and enhanced-category constructions used in [F1] and [F2].

Proof

1.1F1F2A1

For E∈Perf⁡T(X) and F∈Perf⁡S(X), at x∉T∩S at least one factor has acyclic stalk. A derived tensor with a zero object is zero: compute with K-flat stalk representatives and use preservation of quasi-isomorphisms. Hence (E⊗LF)x is acyclic there. This proves the mixed pairing, including the special case of a Perf⁡(X) factor by taking its support bound to be X. It is exact in each variable by [F1], since the support subcategories inherit finite stable operations.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The module associativity and the unit OX action are restrictions of the ambient coherent tensor. These operations land in the supported full subcategories by step 1.1, so their higher coherences also restrict. The unit for the action lies in Perf⁡(X); it is not asserted to lie in Perf⁡T(X). This proves the precise tensor-ideal and module statements.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

For T⊆Y and E∈Perf⁡T(Y), if x∉f−1T and y=f(x), then Ey≃0. The stalk formula (Lf∗E)x≃OX,x⊗OY,yLEy, obtained from the K-flat pullback construction, makes (Lf∗E)x zero. Thus pullback has the stated support. Its symmetric monoidal comparison from [F1] commutes with the ambient actions and mixed products; fullness retains these coherences on supported objects. This proves the Statement for arbitrary subsets, using open restriction only when the complement is open.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.