Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

K-flat roofs give the full derived localization

PDF p. 3: K-flat localization fiber comparison: focused authoring addendum

Statement

Assume AC. For any scheme X let A=Mod(OX), the abelian category of all Zariski module sheaves, K=K(A) its cochain homotopy category, and H⊆K the full subcategory on K-flat complexes. Let S be the quasi-isomorphisms in K and SH=S∩Arrows(H). Then the functor induced by actual inclusion

(SH)−1H⟶S−1K=D(OX)

is an exact equivalence, including full faithfulness. Consequently the actual inclusion induces an exact equivalence F(X)[WX⁻¹]→𝒟(X) of stable infinity-localizations, with F(X) the ordinary category of K-flat complexes and WX its quasi-isomorphisms, and 𝒟(X) the supplied derived enhancement. The ordinary-localization assertion holds for any ringed space. No K-flat complex is assumed K-projective, and morphisms in these localizations are not replaced by chain maps without denominators.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X, all unbounded sheaf complexes, AC and fixed universes. Use a larger universe to form their homotopy categories and localizations.

Goal: Prove essential surjectivity, fullness and faithfulness of this actual localization functor, then its stable enhanced upgrade.

[F1]

External full-subcategory localization criterion gives Stacks Lemma 13.5.8 and the quasi-isomorphism multiplicative system, with the precise right-roof/common-refinement calculus.

[F2]

External K-flat sheaf resolution and pullback input includes Stacks Lemma 20.26.12 (06YF), providing R→M K-flat and quasi-isomorphic for every complex M, and Lemma 20.26.6 (079S), providing shift/cone closure.

[F3]

External localization of one marked scheme and tensor family supplies HA Proposition 1.3.4.5 (chain-interval localization and dg nerve) and Drew Theorem 1.3 (stable Verdier localization). External input on derived enhancements identifies 𝒟(X) as localization of all complexes, with h𝒟(X)=D(OX).

[F4]

External full-subcategory localization criterion records the exact h/ordinary-nerve adjunction of HTT Proposition 1.2.3.1. Applying that adjunction to the localization universal property identifies h(C[W⁻¹]) with the ordinary localization (hC)[(hW)⁻¹].

Proof

1.1F1F2given

The subcategory H is full because between K-flat complexes it keeps all chain maps modulo all chain homotopies. K-flatness is invariant under chain homotopy equivalence: tensoring preserves homotopies, hence preserves contractibility and the acyclicity test defining K-flatness. Zero and shifts are K-flat, and the cone of a map between K-flat complexes is K-flat by [F2]. Distinguished triangles inherited from K therefore make H a full pretriangulated subcategory. By [F1], S is saturated and compatible with the triangulated structure, and S⁻¹K=D(OX).

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Every M∈K receives a quasi-isomorphism R→M with R K-flat by [F2]. This verifies the replacement hypothesis of Stacks Lemma 13.5.8 for every ambient object, without boundedness or global scheme hypotheses. Together with step 1.1 all its hypotheses hold. Thus SH is a saturated compatible multiplicative system and (SH)⁻¹H→S⁻¹K is an exact equivalence by [F1]. The following two steps make the full-faithfulness content explicit.

2.2F1F2step 1.1

For fullness, let P,Q∈H and represent a derived morphism by the right roof P←sM→aQ in K, with s∈S, using [F1]. Choose r:R→M as in [F2]. Then P←srR→arQ is a roof in H with denominator sr∈SH and represents the same ambient derived morphism. Thus the map on each localized Hom set is surjective. Essential surjectivity on objects follows from the same replacement R→M.

2.3F1F2step 1.1

For faithfulness, let roofs P←siRi→aiQ in H, for i=1,2, have equal images in S⁻¹K. The right-calculus equivalence relation in [F1] provides a common refining roof P←tM→bQ in K and maps ui:M→Ri in K with si ui=t∈S and ai ui=b. Choose a K-flat quasi-isomorphism r:R→M. Then ui r:R→Ri are morphisms of the full subcategory H, the common denominator tr belongs to SH, and si ui r=tr and ai ui r=br as equalities in H. They are equalities of homotopy classes; any witnessing chain homotopies are the same homotopies in the full complex subcategory, so no lifting of homotopies is needed. Hence P←trR→brQ is a common refining roof in H. The two original roofs are equal in (SH)⁻¹H by the same [F1] equivalence relation. Thus the map on Hom sets is injective.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3

Let CX=F(X)[WX⁻¹] denote the common model's fiber. K-flat complexes are closed under the finite chain interval because it is built from finite sums, shifts and cones. By [F3], first localizing F(X) at chain homotopy equivalences gives its stable dg nerve; localizing further at quasi-isomorphisms is the stable Verdier localization by acyclic objects. Thus CX is stable. Actual inclusion into all complexes induces IX:CX→𝒟(X), and IX is exact: zero and the cofiber cone diagrams are preserved by inclusion and the exact localizations. By [F4], the homotopy category of this localization is precisely (SH)⁻¹H, so hI_X is the functor proved fully faithful and essentially surjective in steps 2.1 through 2.3.

4.1F3step 3.1∎

For P,Q∈CX and m≥0, the homotopy group at zero of its stable mapping space is Hom_{hC_X}(P[m],Q), and similarly in 𝒟(X). Exactness of IX identifies the shift comparison, so hI_X being fully faithful identifies these homotopy groups and the sets of components. Stable mapping spaces are grouplike; translation by any component reduces its basepoint to zero. Hence every Map(P,Q)→Map(IXP,IXQ) is an equivalence of spaces. Essential surjectivity follows from hI_X, so IX is an exact equivalence of the actual stable enhancements. This proves exactly the missing fiber comparison for the unchanged coherent-family construction.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.