How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External input on derived enhancements
PDF p. 16: Perfect complexes with support
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and fix suitable universes. For a scheme , let be the infinity-localization of cochain complexes of Zariski -modules at quasi-isomorphisms. For a ring , define similarly using -modules. These are stable presentable infinity-categories, with ordinary unbounded derived categories as their homotopy categories. Degreewise exact additive functors induce exact functors on these localizations. Mapping cones represent cofibers. Both the enhanced categories and their homotopy categories are idempotent complete.
Source contract
Given: A scheme or ring, the Axiom of Choice, and a universe containing the relevant modules.
Goal: Record the ambient derived enhancements and their relation to ordinary derived categories.
[F1] The cited Stacks remark supplies the Grothendieck property; the cited Higher Algebra results supply the derived localization and presentability.
[F2] The cited Higher Topos Theory and Higher Algebra results supply enhanced and homotopy-category idempotent completeness.
External input
Import [F1] and [F2] with the stated reading limits. A quasi-isomorphism induces isomorphisms on all cohomology objects. Stable means having a zero object and finite limits and colimits, with pushout squares also pullback squares. Exact functors preserve these finite operations. No identification of with the quasi-coherent-cohomology subcategory is asserted for arbitrary .
Depends on
Used by · 11
- Perfect complexes on schemes and their support
- Restriction, stalks and cohomological support
- Bounded finite-projective complexes and affine chain models
- Enhanced affine perfect equivalence
- Stable supported perfect subcategories and retracts
- K-flat roofs give the full derived localization
- One coherent K-flat family and its supplied perfect fibers
- Essential smallness of perfect and supported categories
- The exact restriction kernel and its denominators
- Supported perfect complexes are invariant under an open neighbourhood
- External regular perfection and the standard derived t structure
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Sheaves of modules on a ringed site and modules over a ring form Grothendieck abelian categories; derived Hom sets can be calculated using K-injective resolutions.
Hypotheses: A ringed site or a ring, with the relevant categories taken in a fixed universe.
Reading limits: Read the displayed remark; its referenced K-injective existence theorem was not reconstructed.
For a Grothendieck abelian category, the derived infinity-category is the localization of complexes at quasi-isomorphisms, is stable and presentable, and has the classical derived category as homotopy category. A stable infinity-category is idempotent complete exactly when its homotopy category is.
Hypotheses: A Grothendieck abelian category in a fixed universe.
Reading limits: Inspected the cited localization and presentability passages and the statement of Lemma 1.2.4.6; the model-category construction and its prerequisites were not reconstructed.
A coherent idempotent splits when its associated idempotent diagram has a colimit; the associated retract can be formed using the sequential diagram of repeated endomorphisms.
Hypotheses: An infinity-category with the indicated colimit, in particular one with all small colimits.
Reading limits: Inspected the cited statements and displayed argument around Proposition 4.4.5.17; the surrounding theory is imported.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Injectives, Remark 19.13.3 · Remark 19.13.3
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra · Propositions 1.3.5.13–15 and 1.3.5.21; Lemma 1.2.4.6
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Topos Theory · Corollary 4.4.5.15, Proposition 4.4.5.17 and Remark 4.4.5.18