How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Enhanced affine perfect equivalence
PDF p. 16: Perfect complexes with support
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For with commutative and unital, degreewise associated sheaf induces an exact equivalence of stable infinity-categories, where the target is the full subcategory with quasi-coherent cohomology. It restricts to an equivalence between the full subcategory represented by bounded finite-projective complexes and the full locally perfect subcategory on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , and Choice as stated.
Goal: Prove enhanced equivalence for the actual associated-sheaf functor.
External input on derived enhancements gives the localizations and their stable structures.
External affine derived and perfect comparisons gives the classical equivalence induced by associated sheaf and the perfection criterion.
Local perfection implies quasi-coherent cohomology places locally perfect objects in the quasi-coherent-cohomology subcategory. Bounded finite-projective complexes and affine chain models and Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version specify the ring-perfect representatives.
Proof
Exact degreewise associated sheaf preserves quasi-isomorphisms and cones, so [F1] gives an exact induced functor . Its cohomology sheaves are associated sheaves of module cohomology, so it lands in . This full subcategory is stable: on affine opens, quasi-coherent sheaves are closed under kernels, cokernels and extensions, and the cohomology sequence of a cone therefore remains quasi-coherent.
By [F2], the functor induced by this same on homotopy categories is an equivalence. In a stable infinity-category, the homotopy groups of a mapping space at zero are for . Exactness and the homotopy-category equivalence identify these groups for ; translation in the grouplike mapping spaces treats all basepoints. Thus every mapping-space map is an equivalence, and essential surjectivity follows from the homotopy-category equivalence. Hence is an equivalence.
By [F2], a module complex is ring-perfect exactly when its image is locally perfect. By [F3], every locally perfect object belongs to the target of step 2.1. The equivalence therefore restricts to the stated full subcategories.
Depends on
Used by · 6
- Perfect complexes on schemes and their support
- Units split the K one determinant
- Coherent derived tensor and pullback on perfect complexes
- External connective, nonconnective and automorphism comparisons
- Local free chains detect natural perfect operations on every qcqs base
- Full affine K-space comparison and its sheafification
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.