How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Units split the K one determinant
PDF p. 9: Surjectivity of the determinant on K1
Statement
Assume AC and let X be a quasi-compact quasi-separated scheme, with K(X)=𝕂(Perf(X)) as specified in Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes. There is a natural group homomorphism
There is a natural determinant homomorphism det_X:K₁(X)→Γ(X,)×, characterized by the usual stable matrix determinant on each affine restriction under the explicit affine comparison. It satisfies det_X∘=id; hence determinant is surjective and injective. For a vector-bundle automorphism α, det_X([α]) is the unit inducing the top-exterior-power automorphism det(α) of its determinant line (defined locally on rank loci). Neither a global resolution property nor regularity/noetherian hypotheses are required. This statement makes no identification of a motivic projection with determinant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: qcqs X, AC, the supplied perfect enhancement and nonconnective K functor; rings below are commutative and unital. The notation [α] is the automorphism loop under the natural core→connective K→nonconnective K construction, not an object class in K₀.
Goal: Establish the precise affine π₁ comparison and unit normalization, construct det_X and , and prove the splitting.
Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes supplies the actual sheaf-derived perfect model and exact pullbacks. Enhanced affine perfect equivalence and Bounded finite-projective complexes and affine chain models identify its affine fiber with the enhanced bounded finite-projective model. Coherent derived tensor and pullback on perfect complexes identifies actual affine pullback with derived extension of scalars on those representatives.
External matrix, exact and bounded-projective K-theory comparisons supplies the matrix/Quillen/S/Gillet–Waldhausen comparisons, with their automorphism-class normalization.
External connective, nonconnective and automorphism comparisons supplies the actual Waldhausen-to-infinity K comparison, the natural automorphism classes and j inducing an isomorphism on π₁ to the supplied nonconnective functor.
Determinant on the stable general linear group constructs determinant on GL(A)_ab; Stable determinant commutes with ring maps proves its ring-map naturality.
Compatible local units glue uniquely and Gluing compatible local determinant homomorphisms supply unit sheaf gluing and the induced homomorphism. A right inverse makes a homomorphism surjective gives surjectivity and injectivity from a right inverse.
Exterior powers and determinant of an algebraic bundle supplies the exterior-power determinant line and its local wedge bases and pullback compatibility.
Proof
For a ring A, P(A) is split exact: a surjection onto a projective module has a section, so its kernel is a direct summand of the finite projective source and is finite projective. This verifies the kernel-of-surjections hypothesis of Gillet–Waldhausen in [F2]. The Waldhausen category C(A) of bounded finite-projective cochain complexes has mapping cylinders, so every map factors as a degreewise split monomorphism followed by a quasi-isomorphism. Its homotopy category after quasi-isomorphisms is the enhanced perfect category’s homotopy category by [F1]; hence a map is a weak equivalence exactly when it becomes an isomorphism (DHKS-saturation). Indeed the cone of a quasi-isomorphism between bounded projectives is bounded acyclic projective and contractible: apply the K-projective mapping property in [F1] to its identity. Thus the comparison hypotheses in [F3] hold.
Compose the actual maps of [F2], the actual Waldhausen/infinity comparison of [F3], j on π₁ from [F3], and the exact affine enhancement equivalence of [F1]. They give an isomorphism . Every step carries an automorphism M of Aⁿ to the class of that same degree-zero automorphism: degree-zero inclusion is literal, the S-construction comparisons use its core loop, and associated sheaf sends it to its matrix acting on . Thus . This uses π₁ agreement in the positive-degree range of j; no π₀-only comparison is substituted.
This is natural for unital A→B. Extension of scalars takes finite projectives to finite projectives and preserves split monomorphisms. A bounded projective quasi-isomorphism is a homotopy equivalence by step 1.1, so tensor with B preserves it without a flatness hypothesis. Hence it is weakly exact on C(A). All comparisons are induced by the corresponding actual functors in [F1]–[F3], and on matrix generators they send M to its entrywise image. The resulting π₁ naturality square commutes. Define ; [F4] makes these homomorphisms commute with all such ring maps, and ([u])=u by step 2.1.
Given k∈K₁(X), on each affine open V=Spec(A) take . On an intersection of two affine opens, restrict further to any affine neighbourhood W inside that intersection. Naturality from step 3.1 identifies both restrictions with . They therefore agree as sections on the intersection by the sheaf uniqueness axiom. Apply [F5] to glue a unique global unit det_X(k). The same gluing lemma shows det_X is a homomorphism and independent of the affine cover.
A global unit is the automorphism of . The natural automorphism map in [F3] defines (u)=[]. Composition makes a group homomorphism. It is compatible with scheme pullback by [F1] and [F3]. Restriction to an affine V sends its class to the class [u|_V] of step 2.1.
The restriction of det_X((u)) to each affine V is u|_V by steps 3.1 and 5.1. Unit sheaf uniqueness in [F5] gives det_X((u))=u globally. The right-inverse lemma in [F5] proves surjectivity of determinant and injectivity of . For f:Y→X between qcqs schemes, choose an affine V around f(y) and an affine W around y inside f⁻¹(V). Step 3.1 proves determinant naturality on W; sheaf uniqueness then proves it globally. Thus both maps are natural on the stated category.
For an automorphism α of a vector bundle E, choose affine opens where E is free of constant rank. Naturality of the automorphism construction restricts [α] to the matrix class of α there. The top-wedge expansion in [F6] says that its action on det(E) is multiplication by that matrix determinant, exactly the local unit used in step 4.1. These local units glue uniquely; a line-bundle automorphism is canonically multiplication by a unit, because that is true on trivializations and scalar multiplication commutes with transition units. Thus det_X([α]) has the asserted exterior determinant interpretation. The empty scheme has only the unique unit and zero K-group, so the same assertion also includes it. This completes the proof.
Depends on
- Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes
- Exterior powers and determinant of an algebraic bundle
- Enhanced affine perfect equivalence
- Bounded finite-projective complexes and affine chain models
- Coherent derived tensor and pullback on perfect complexes
- External matrix, exact and bounded-projective K-theory comparisons
- External connective, nonconnective and automorphism comparisons
- Determinant on the stable general linear group
- Stable determinant commutes with ring maps
- Compatible local units glue uniquely
- Gluing compatible local determinant homomorphisms
- A right inverse makes a homomorphism surjective
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.