How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External affine derived and perfect comparisons
PDF p. 16: Perfect complexes with support
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a commutative unital ring and . Degreewise associated sheaf induces an equivalence , where the target is the full subcategory of whose cohomology sheaves are quasi-coherent. The associated object of an -complex is locally perfect if and only if the complex is isomorphic in to a bounded complex of finitely generated projective modules.
Source contract
Given: and as above, and possibly unbounded complexes.
Goal: Record the classical affine comparison and its perfection criterion.
[F1] The cited Stacks Lemma 36.3.5 gives the derived equivalence.
[F2] The cited Stacks Lemma 36.10.7 gives the perfection criterion; the ring convention is that of Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version.
External input
Import [F1] and [F2] with the stated reading limits. This item asserts a classical derived equivalence; the enhanced comparison is established separately for the actual induced functor.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For an affine scheme X = Spec(A), associated sheaf induces an equivalence from D(A) to the full derived subcategory with quasi-coherent cohomology, with inverse derived global sections.
Hypotheses: A is a commutative unital ring; complexes may be unbounded.
Reading limits: Inspected the statement and the displayed beginning of the proof; the unbounded derived comparison and its prerequisites are imported, not reconstructed.
For X = Spec(A), the associated derived object of an A-complex is perfect exactly when the A-complex is perfect.
Hypotheses: A is a commutative unital ring; ring-perfect means having a bounded finitely generated projective representative in D(A).
Reading limits: Read the statement and its short proof reference. The referenced pseudo-coherence and Tor-amplitude arguments are not reconstructed.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Derived Categories of Schemes · Lemma 36.3.5
- The Stacks Project, Derived Categories of Schemes · Lemma 36.10.7