How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External regular perfection and the standard derived t structure
PDF p. 15: Supported degree-zero dévissage
Statement
For the enhanced perfect-category assertion, assume the Axiom of Choice and fix suitable universes. Let be a regular Noetherian finite-dimensional scheme. Inside the specified sheaf-derived infinity-category, the full subcategory of perfect objects is precisely the full subcategory of objects with bounded coherent cohomology. The standard cohomological truncation functors and their truncation cofiber sequences are those of the ambient derived t-structure, whose heart is ordinary sheaves of modules.
For a locally Noetherian scheme, coherent sheaves form an abelian full subcategory, with kernels, images and cokernels computed as module sheaves. A complex having coherent cohomology and only finitely many nonzero cohomology sheaves remains so under standard truncation.
Source contract
[A1] The stated The Axiom of Choice and universe bounds discharge the selected enhancement premises of Perfect complexes on schemes and their support and the derived-enhancement input in [F2]. They apply to the enhanced perfect-category assertion. The coherent-sheaf and truncation-of-cohomology assertions in the second paragraph are the ordinary local statements of [F1] and do not invoke that enhanced realization.
Given: For the enhanced assertion, the Axiom of Choice, suitable universes, and the specified infinity-localization of Zariski module cochain complexes on , and its underlying ordinary derived category.
Goal: Import local regular perfection and standard truncation, without asserting global vector-bundle resolutions.
[F1] Stacks Lemmas 36.11.6(1) and 36.11.8 establish exactly the equality of object conditions in the Statement; the introduction to §36.11 gives the coherent abelian subcategory.
[F2] Higher Algebra Proposition 1.3.5.21(2) with Definition 1.3.5.16 and Remark 1.3.5.19 supplies the ambient derived t-structure, with cochain index reversal. External input on derived enhancements has already specified this actual localization.
External input
Import [F1]–[F2] under their exact hypotheses and reading limits. This is an equality of full subcategories defined by objects in the already specified enhancement; it is not an inference of an enhanced equivalence from an abstract triangulated equivalence. The regular-perfect result is local on affine neighbourhoods. Neither a global bounded locally free resolution nor an equivalence with is needed or asserted.
Depends on
- Perfect complexes on schemes and their support
- External input on derived enhancements
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Stacks Project, Derived Categories of Schemes · §36.11 introduction; Lemma 36.11.6(1); Lemma 36.11.8 and its proof
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra · Definition 1.3.5.16 and Proposition 1.3.5.18 p. 128; Remark 1.3.5.19 and Proposition 1.3.5.21(2) p. 129
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
On a regular scheme every object with bounded coherent cohomology is perfect. On a Noetherian regular scheme every perfect object has bounded coherent cohomology. Coherent sheaves form an abelian subcategory on a locally Noetherian scheme.
Hypotheses: The forward regularity statement is local; the converse assumes quasi-compactness/Noetherianity. Here U is regular Noetherian finite-dimensional, so both directions apply. Perfection is local bounded finite locally free representation, not a global vector-bundle resolution.
Reading limits: Read the full introduction and Lemmas 36.11.6(1) and 36.11.8 with their proofs on the full-text 08E0 page. Affine regular-ring/perfect prerequisites cited by the short proof remain imported; no global resolution theorem or D^b(Coh)-enhancement comparison is invoked.
The derived infinity-category of a Grothendieck abelian category has the standard homology t-structure; its heart is the original abelian category and its truncations are the usual derived truncations.
Hypotheses: Grothendieck abelian category, here Zariski sheaves of O_U-modules. Homological indexing in HA is reversed to cochain H^n. Use the same infinity-localization already supplied by the completed derived-enhancement interface.
Reading limits: Read pp. 125–130, specifically the displayed t-structure definitions, Remark 1.3.5.19 and Proposition 1.3.5.21 with its proof. The underlying model/localization construction remains the existing completed supplier; only the t-structure and heart statements are imported here.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Derived Categories of Schemes · §36.11 introduction; Lemma 36.11.6(1); Lemma 36.11.8 and its proof
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra · Definition 1.3.5.16 and Proposition 1.3.5.18 p. 128; Remark 1.3.5.19 and Proposition 1.3.5.21(2) p. 129