Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External regular perfection and the standard derived t structure

PDF p. 15: Supported degree-zero dévissage

Statement

For the enhanced perfect-category assertion, assume the Axiom of Choice and fix suitable universes. Let U be a regular Noetherian finite-dimensional scheme. Inside the specified sheaf-derived infinity-category, the full subcategory of perfect objects is precisely the full subcategory of objects with bounded coherent cohomology. The standard cohomological truncation functors τ≤n,τ≥n and their truncation cofiber sequences are those of the ambient derived t-structure, whose heart is ordinary sheaves of modules.

For a locally Noetherian scheme, coherent sheaves form an abelian full subcategory, with kernels, images and cokernels computed as module sheaves. A complex having coherent cohomology and only finitely many nonzero cohomology sheaves remains so under standard truncation.

Source contract

[A1] The stated The Axiom of Choice and universe bounds discharge the selected enhancement premises of Perfect complexes on schemes and their support and the derived-enhancement input in [F2]. They apply to the enhanced perfect-category assertion. The coherent-sheaf and truncation-of-cohomology assertions in the second paragraph are the ordinary local statements of [F1] and do not invoke that enhanced realization.

Given: For the enhanced assertion, the Axiom of Choice, suitable universes, and the specified infinity-localization of Zariski module cochain complexes on U, and its underlying ordinary derived category.

Goal: Import local regular perfection and standard truncation, without asserting global vector-bundle resolutions.

[F1] Stacks Lemmas 36.11.6(1) and 36.11.8 establish exactly the equality of object conditions in the Statement; the introduction to §36.11 gives the coherent abelian subcategory.

[F2] Higher Algebra Proposition 1.3.5.21(2) with Definition 1.3.5.16 and Remark 1.3.5.19 supplies the ambient derived t-structure, with cochain index reversal. External input on derived enhancements has already specified this actual localization.

External input

Import [F1]–[F2] under their exact hypotheses and reading limits. This is an equality of full subcategories defined by objects in the already specified enhancement; it is not an inference of an enhanced equivalence from an abstract triangulated equivalence. The regular-perfect result is local on affine neighbourhoods. Neither a global bounded locally free resolution nor an equivalence with Db(CohT) is needed or asserted.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

The Stacks Project, Derived Categories of Schemes · §36.11 introduction; Lemma 36.11.6(1); Lemma 36.11.8 and its proof

On a regular scheme every object with bounded coherent cohomology is perfect. On a Noetherian regular scheme every perfect object has bounded coherent cohomology. Coherent sheaves form an abelian subcategory on a locally Noetherian scheme.

Hypotheses: The forward regularity statement is local; the converse assumes quasi-compactness/Noetherianity. Here U is regular Noetherian finite-dimensional, so both directions apply. Perfection is local bounded finite locally free representation, not a global vector-bundle resolution.

Reading limits: Read the full introduction and Lemmas 36.11.6(1) and 36.11.8 with their proofs on the full-text 08E0 page. Affine regular-ring/perfect prerequisites cited by the short proof remain imported; no global resolution theorem or D^b(Coh)-enhancement comparison is invoked.

Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra · Definition 1.3.5.16 and Proposition 1.3.5.18 p. 128; Remark 1.3.5.19 and Proposition 1.3.5.21(2) p. 129

The derived infinity-category of a Grothendieck abelian category has the standard homology t-structure; its heart is the original abelian category and its truncations are the usual derived truncations.

Hypotheses: Grothendieck abelian category, here Zariski sheaves of O_U-modules. Homological indexing in HA is reversed to cochain H^n. Use the same infinity-localization already supplied by the completed derived-enhancement interface.

Reading limits: Read pp. 125–130, specifically the displayed t-structure definitions, Remark 1.3.5.19 and Proposition 1.3.5.21 with its proof. The underlying model/localization construction remains the existing completed supplier; only the t-structure and heart statements are imported here.

Sources