How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Detecting injectivity by rationalization
PDF p. 14: Rationalization square for epsilon3
Statement
For an abelian group , the kernel of the natural homomorphism , , is its torsion subgroup: the elements killed by some nonzero integer. Rationalization preserves short exact sequences of abelian groups. Consequently, if is torsion-free and is injective, then a homomorphism is injective. If is also surjective, it is an isomorphism. No divisibility assumption on is made.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Abelian groups, regarded as -modules, and the homomorphisms in the statement.
Goal: Prove the kernel formula and exactness of rationalization, and deduce the injectivity and isomorphism assertions.
The tensor product is generated by elementary tensors subject to additivity in each variable and the balancing relation ; every tensor is a finite sum of elementary tensors (The tensor product M⊗_R N from the additive group underlying the free ℤ-module on M× N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums).
Torsion means annihilation by a nonzero integer, and a group is torsion-free when only zero is torsion (Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module). A short exact sequence has injective, surjective and (Exact sequences and short exact sequences of modules).
Proof
For an abelian group , form fractions with and positive integer , declaring exactly when some positive integer kills . This is an equivalence relation: transitivity follows by multiplying the two annihilating equations by the other denominator and combining them. Addition is independent of representatives by the same cross-multiplication, and gives an abelian group . For , with , the assignment is well-defined and balanced: equality of rational representatives gives an equal cross-product, and the fraction addition formula proves additivity. Thus [F1] gives a homomorphism . Conversely send to . If , then balancing gives , so this map is well-defined and additive. The two maps are inverse on fractions and elementary tensors, hence are inverse isomorphisms. Under this identification the natural map sends to .
By the fraction equivalence, exactly when some positive integer kills . This is equivalent to being killed by a nonzero integer, so the kernel is precisely the torsion subgroup.
Let be short exact. The fraction maps induced by and are well-defined by the defining equivalence. If , then for some positive , so by injectivity of and . Thus is injective. Every has a preimage because is surjective. If , then for some positive ; exactness gives with , and lies in the image of . The reverse inclusion follows from . Hence the fraction sequence is short exact. The isomorphisms of step 1.1 commute with the induced homomorphisms, so tensoring the original sequence with is short exact.
If is injective and , naturality gives , so . If is torsion-free, steps 2.1 and [F2] give ; therefore is injective. If it is also surjective, its set-theoretic inverse is a homomorphism, since the preimages of sums are sums of preimages, and is an isomorphism.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.