Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pointed simplicial constructions and sequential model structures

PDF p. 3: Filtered S1 spectra: stable enhancement prerequisites

Statement

Assume ZFC. Let sSet∗ be the category of simplicial sets with a specified map ∗=Δ[0]→A and maps preserving it. Put T+=T⨿∗ for an unpointed simplicial set T. For pointed A,B, define A∧B=(A×B)/(A×∗∪∗×B), degreewise, and define Map⁡∗(A,B)q=Hom⁡sSet∗(A∧Δ[q]+,B), with simplicial operators induced by those of Δ[q] and basepoint the constant map. These constructions give the smash–mapping adjunction. Set K=Δ[1]/∂Δ[1], based at the collapsed boundary, and ΩB=Map⁡∗(K,B).

For clarity, ∣T∣ means the quotient of ∐q≥0Tq×{(t0,…,tq)∈R≥0q+1:∑ti=1} by (T(α)x,t)∼(x,α∗t) for each order-preserving α:[p]→[q], where α∗ sums coordinates over each fiber. The Kan model structure on sSet∗ has weak equivalences the maps whose realizations are weak homotopy equivalences, fibrations the underlying Kan fibrations, and cofibrations the degreewise injections. It has functorial model factorizations; all objects are cofibrant and its fibrant objects are the Kan complexes. Generating cofibrations are I+={∂Δ[q]+→Δ[q]+:q≥0} and generating trivial cofibrations are J+={Λr[q]+→Δ[q]+:q≥1,0≤r≤q}. Here generation means that trivial fibrations and fibrations are detected by the right lifting properties against I+ and J+, respectively, with the corresponding small-object factorizations. All generator domains and codomains have finitely many nondegenerate simplices. Smash product satisfies the pushout-product axiom: for cofibrations i:A→B and j:C→D, (B∧C)⨿A∧C(A∧D)→B∧D is a cofibration, trivial if either i or j is trivial. In particular K∧(−)⊣Ω is a Quillen adjunction.

A sequential prespectrum is a sequence Xn in sSet∗, n≥0, with sphere-first maps K∧Xn→Xn+1; a map of prespectra is a sequence commuting with these maps. This category has the projective model structure, whose weak equivalences and fibrations are levelwise and whose cofibrations have the left lifting property against all levelwise trivial fibrations. It also has the sequential stable model structure, with the same cofibrations, and fibrant objects precisely the level-Kan prespectra whose adjoint maps Xn→ΩXn+1 are weak equivalences. To specify its weak equivalences concretely, let M(A,E)q be the set of prespectrum maps A∧Δ[q]+→E, where (A∧T)n=An∧T and its structure map is K∧(An∧T)≅(K∧An)∧T→An+1∧T. For a functorial projective cofibrant replacement PA→A, a map f:A→B is a stable equivalence exactly when M(PB,E)→M(PA,E) is a weak equivalence of simplicial sets for every such fibrant E. Stable fibrations are the maps with the right lifting property against the cofibrations that are stable equivalences.

External input

The Kan model structure, its pointed generators, the smash–mapping adjunction and its pushout-product property are imported from Hovey's Model categories at the locators in reference 0. The sequential projective and stable structures and the mapping-space criterion are imported from reference 1, specifically its pointed-simplicial specialization. Its Theorem 5.7 supplies the levelwise tensor and compatible-map enrichment used in M; the projective cofibrant and level-fibrant inputs make this the derived mapping space of §2. The displayed quotient and mapping formulas fix the interfaces of those imports. No assertion about symmetric spectra or motivic localizations is included.

The Axiom of Choice is allowed in the imported small-object factorizations and model-structure existence constructions, including simultaneous selections of lifts. No independent reconstruction of those substantial existence arguments is claimed. In particular the stable existence premise is the specific simplicial case of Corollary 3.5, rather than an unverified invocation of the general left proper cellular localization theorem.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Mark Hovey, Model categories · §3.1, pp. 75–77 (simplices, function complex and realization); Definition 3.2.1 and Proposition 3.2.2, p. 79; Proposition 1.1.8, p. 5; Lemma 2.1.21, p. 36; Theorem 3.6.5 and Corollary 3.6.6, p. 98; Definition 4.2.1, Lemma 4.2.2 and Definition 4.2.6, pp. 107–109; Proposition 4.2.9 and Corollary 4.2.10, p. 110; Definition 4.2.18 and following examples, p. 114 (PDF pages are printed pages + 10)

The Kan model structure on pointed simplicial sets has underlying monomorphisms as cofibrations, Kan fibrations as fibrations and realization weak equivalences as weak equivalences. It is generated by boundaries and horns with a disjoint basepoint, and smash product satisfies the pushout-product axiom.

Hypotheses: Ordinary set-valued simplicial sets and basepoint-preserving maps; the pointed model structure is induced from unpointed simplicial sets. Work in ZFC for the cited model-category constructions. The smash product is the pointed quotient of the cartesian product.

Reading limits: Inspected the stated definition and theorem interfaces, the proof of Proposition 4.2.9, the generator description in Lemma 2.1.21, and the preceding function-complex/realization constructions. The full Kan model-structure proof, small-object argument and monoidal recognition theory are imported, not reconstructed.

Mark Hovey, Spectra and symmetric spectra in general model categories · Definition 1.1 and Definition 1.2, p. 5; Definition 1.8, p. 7; Theorem 1.14, p. 8; §2 opening and Definition 2.1, p. 10; Definition 3.1, pp. 11–12; Definition 3.3 and Theorem 3.4, p. 13; Corollary 3.5 and its proof, p. 14; Theorem 5.7, especially the explicit enrichment and the projective portion of its proof, pp. 26–27

For pointed simplicial sets with circle suspension, projective and sequential stable model structures exist. Projective weak equivalences and fibrations are levelwise; stable cofibrations are projective cofibrations. Stable fibrant objects are level-Kan Omega-spectra, and stable weak equivalences are detected by derived mapping spaces into them.

Hypotheses: Theorem 1.14 uses a cofibrantly generated base and a left Quillen suspension. The general localization construction in §§2–3 uses a left proper cellular base. The exact pointed-simplicial circle specialization is imported from Corollary 3.5; this record does not claim to reprove the general localization theorem or independently verify cellularity.

Reading limits: Inspected the listed statements, the function-complex and local-equivalence definitions in §2, the proof of Corollary 3.5, and the explicit tensor/enrichment and projective-model portion of the proof of Theorem 5.7. Import is confined to the ordinary sequential pointed simplicial specialization; the general localization proof and Appendix cellularity arguments are not reconstructed.

Sources

  • Mark Hovey, Model categories · §3.1, pp. 75–77 (simplices, function complex and realization); Definition 3.2.1 and Proposition 3.2.2, p. 79; Proposition 1.1.8, p. 5; Lemma 2.1.21, p. 36; Theorem 3.6.5 and Corollary 3.6.6, p. 98; Definition 4.2.1, Lemma 4.2.2 and Definition 4.2.6, pp. 107–109; Proposition 4.2.9 and Corollary 4.2.10, p. 110; Definition 4.2.18 and following examples, p. 114 (PDF pages are printed pages + 10)
  • Mark Hovey, Spectra and symmetric spectra in general model categories · Definition 1.1 and Definition 1.2, p. 5; Definition 1.8, p. 7; Theorem 1.14, p. 8; §2 opening and Definition 2.1, p. 10; Definition 3.1, pp. 11–12; Definition 3.3 and Theorem 3.4, p. 13; Corollary 3.5 and its proof, p. 14; Theorem 5.7, especially the explicit enrichment and the projective portion of its proof, pp. 26–27