How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External dg-nerve mapping and complex-localization bridges
PDF p. 16: Perfect complexes with support
Statement
Assume Choice and the fixed universes of the derived enhancement. For module complexes, use the differential graded nerve of the category enriched in Hom complexes. Quasi-isomorphisms of Hom complexes induce equivalences of the associated mapping spaces. Its reflective derived localization has unit a quasi-isomorphism to a fibrant complex, and adjunction identifies with , naturally in . The composite from ordinary complexes is the quasi-isomorphism localization defining the supplied .
For a full dg subcategory of complexes in an additive category, closed under identity mapping cylinders, its ordinary category localized at cochain homotopy equivalences is equivalent to by the canonical inclusion.
Statement references
Source contract
Given: Module complexes and, in the last assertion, a full dg subcategory with the stated cylinder closure.
Goal: Import the mapping-space and localization bridges, not a proof of perfect-model equivalence.
[A1] The Axiom of Choice and Grothendieck universe closure convention retain the assumptions of External input on derived enhancements, including the module categories and their unbounded derived localization. Universes containing the data and are assumed to exist; this is not deduced from Choice.
[F1] The Hom complex of chain complexes supplies the Hom enrichment. Read its chain grading as ; its Hom degree is cochain degree . Composition is composition of graded maps, with its usual graded Leibniz identity. The dg nerve is the construction imported from reference 0, rather than the nerve of the ordinary category obtained by forgetting higher homotopies.
[F2] Identity mapping cylinders are those of reference 0, equivalently with the usual endpoint maps. The mapping cone of a chain map supplies cones after the same reversal of grading. A cochain homotopy equivalence is a cochain map admitting an inverse up to homotopies , as in the supplied derived enhancement.
External input
Import reference 0 under [A1], using the cochain translation [F1] and the cylinder convention [F2]. The adjunction and nerve comparisons are established external inputs; no local proof is claimed.
Depends on
- External input on derived enhancements
- The Hom complex of chain complexes
- The mapping cone of a chain map
- The Axiom of Choice
- Grothendieck universe closure convention
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra (September 18, 2017) · Construction 1.3.1.6, Remark 1.3.1.12 (pp. 81, 83); Proposition 1.3.4.5 (p. 109); Definition 1.3.5.8 and Propositions 1.3.5.13–15 (pp. 125, 127)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The dg nerve computes mapping spaces from Hom complexes; fibrant replacement realizes reflective derived localization; cylinder-closed full complex subcategories localize at homotopy equivalences to their dg nerves.
Hypotheses: Additive categories for cylinders; Grothendieck abelian module categories for unbounded derived localization; fixed universes. Reverse chain grading for cochains.
Reading limits: Read the listed construction, remark, definition and propositions, including the proofs of 1.3.5.13–15. The proof of 1.3.4.5 and nerve/model foundations are imported, not reconstructed. Printed page numbers.
Sources
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra (September 18, 2017) · Construction 1.3.1.6, Remark 1.3.1.12 (pp. 81, 83); Proposition 1.3.4.5 (p. 109); Definition 1.3.5.8 and Propositions 1.3.5.13–15 (pp. 125, 127)