Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External geometric properties of the actual motivic comparison fiber

PDF p. 4: Motivic dimension vanishing

Statement

For a prime field F and j≥0, define the actual comparison fiber Fj,F=fib⁡(Mj,F→αj,FCj,F). It is a finitary Nisnevich sheaf, satisfies LcdhFj,F=0 and pro-cdh descent on Noetherian F-schemes, and for every F-algebra A and finitely generated nilpotent ideal I⊆A one has fib⁡(Fj,F(A)→Fj,F(A/I))∈D(Z)≤j.

Source contract

Given: The actual complexes and comparison of External prime-field cdh comparison and cdh dimension bound, with prime field F and nonnegative weight.

Goal: Import exactly the geometric hypotheses later normalized for the dimension criterion.

[F1] EM Proposition8.12, with its proof, gives all the stated properties of this specified fiber; Theorem8.2 is its pro-cdh ingredient.

External input

Import [F1] under the recorded hypotheses and reading limits. Throughout this package and its dimension-criterion application, pro-cdh descent means the explicit degreewise convention in EM Theorem 8.2, footnote 14: every cohomology group of the levelwise total fiber for an abstract blowup square and its infinitesimal thickenings is zero as a pro abelian group. The source's additional comparison with cartesianness in the unbounded category Pro⁡(D(Z)) is not imported. The dimension criterion's proof needs only this degreewise condition. In particular, no degreewise extraction from vanishing K-groups is used. The characteristic-zero derived de Rham and characteristic-p syntomic-rigidity arguments underlying the relative bound, and the pro-cdh machinery, remain explicit imported foundations. The local argument below checks their application and the shift required by the criterion instead of claiming to reprove them.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes · Proposition8.12 p.57 and its proof p.58; Theorem8.2 p.54, footnote14, and its proof p.55; Theorem8.7 p.55 for identification of the intended fiber

For j≥0 and a prime field F, W(j)=fib(Z(j)_mot→Z(j)_cdh) is a finitary Nisnevich sheaf, has L_cdhW(j)=0, satisfies pro-cdh descent on Noetherian F-schemes, and W(j)(A,I)∈D≤j for every F-algebra A and finitely generated nilpotent ideal I.

Hypotheses: Prime-field F-schemes, weight j≥0. The nilpotent-relative statement is for F-algebras with finitely generated nilpotent ideal. In applying the criterion A is Noetherian, so finite generation holds automatically.

Reading limits: Read the full statement on p57 and its proof on p58. Also read the pro-cdh theorem statement p54 and its proof p55. The proof of8.12 cites characteristic-zero derived de Rham descriptions or characteristic-p syntomic rigidity; these substantial inputs and their pro-cdh foundations are imported, not reconstructed. Use the safe explicit proposition bound≤j, not a stronger bound suggested by isolated wording in its proof.

Sources