How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Normalizing the comparison fiber for the dimension criterion
PDF p. 4: Motivic dimension vanishing
Statement
For and a prime field , set , with cochain shift . Then satisfies every hypothesis of the dimension criterion over base ring : it is finitary Nisnevich, cdh-acyclic, pro-cdh on Noetherian -schemes, and has nilpotent-relative values in degrees on every Noetherian local henselian -algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The actual fiber and the shift convention in the Statement.
Goal: Check the precise domain, ideal and degree hypotheses before applying the criterion.
External geometric properties of the actual motivic comparison fiber gives finitariness, Nisnevich descent, cdh acyclicity, pro-cdh descent, and the relative bound for finitely generated nilpotent ideals.
External dimension criterion for a cdh-acyclic Nisnevich sheaf is the criterion requiring relative bound for Noetherian local henselian algebras. Prime-field evaluation and compatibility with the standing theory specifies the actual fiber used here.
Proof
Shift by is an equivalence of the stable derived category and commutes with limits and colimits. Thus it preserves the finitary and Nisnevich properties, commutes with pointwise total fibers, and preserves the supplied degreewise pro-cdh condition: for every integer the shifted total-fiber system has of the original system, which is zero as a pro abelian group. This uses the explicit convention of [F1]–[F2], without asserting cartesianness in . It also commutes with cdh sheafification: shifting preserves sheaves and its inverse does likewise, so the reflective sheafification universal property identifies the two composites. Hence retains the first geometric properties of [F1], including .
Let be any Noetherian local henselian -algebra and any nilpotent ideal. Every ideal of a Noetherian ring is finitely generated, so [F1] applies without an added ideal hypothesis. For , the relative cohomology of in degree is the relative cohomology of in degree , hence zero. This is exactly the degree and functor-class hypothesis of [F2]; the source’s stronger arbitrary-algebra package has been used only under its actual finitely-generated-ideal condition.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.