Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External dimension criterion for a cdh-acyclic Nisnevich sheaf

PDF p. 4: Motivic dimension vanishing

Statement

Let R be a base ring and W:(SchRqcqs)op→D(Z) a finitary Nisnevich sheaf. Assume:

  1. LcdhW≃0.
  2. W satisfies pro-cdh descent on Noetherian R-schemes.
  3. For every Noetherian local henselian R-algebra A and every nilpotent ideal I, fib⁡(W(A)→W(A/I))∈D(Z)≤0.

Then W(X)∈D(Z)≤dim⁡X for every Noetherian R-scheme X of finite dimension.

Source contract

Given: All three assumptions and the stated sheaf, continuity and scheme hypotheses.

Goal: Import the established geometric dimension criterion, including its exact input class.

[F1] EM Proposition8.10 is this statement with arbitrary base ring.

External input

Import [F1] with the recorded reading limits. Finitary means that inverse limits of qcqs schemes with affine transition maps are sent to the corresponding filtered colimits of complexes. Nisnevich descent means derived descent for the étale completely decomposed covering families. The cdh topology is generated by Nisnevich covers and abstract blowup covers. An abstract blowup square consists of a proper finitely presented map X′→X, a finitely presented closed immersion Y→X, its pullback Y′, and an isomorphism X′∖Y′≃X∖Y. Pro-cdh descent here has exactly the degreewise convention of EM Theorem 8.2, footnote 14: for each abstract blowup square and its powers-of-ideal thickenings, every cohomology group of the levelwise total fiber is zero as a pro abelian group. No equivalence with a cartesian square in the unbounded category Pro⁡(D(Z)) is used. In the modification step of Proposition 8.10, this degreewise hypothesis suffices: for fixed n>dim⁡X, the induction makes the two lower-dimensional relative cohomology systems vanish in the relevant degrees, and the pro long exact sequence gives the required isomorphism on degree n for the two constant top terms. A nilpotent ideal satisfies In=0 for some n; a henselian local algebra has the usual unique lifting of simple roots from its residue field. These are hypotheses of the imported theorem, not new claims that a general sheaf has them.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes · Proposition8.10 pp.56–57, with its complete proof; Lemma8.9 p.56

A finitary Nisnevich sheaf W on qcqs schemes over a base ring has W(X)∈D≤dimX for every finite-dimensional Noetherian base scheme X, provided L_cdh W=0, W satisfies pro-cdh descent on Noetherian schemes, and W(A,I)∈D≤0 for every Noetherian local henselian base algebra A and nilpotent ideal I.

Hypotheses: Any base ring k; derived complex-valued finitary Nisnevich sheaf on all qcqs k-schemes. All three hypotheses are required. The target scheme is Noetherian with finite Krull dimension.

Reading limits: Read the full proposition and proof pp.56–57, including globalization of the nilpotent-relative hypothesis, reduction to reduced schemes, the dimension induction, Nisnevich spectral sequence and modification/pro-cdh step. The foundational cohomological-dimension, refinement and formal-function statements cited there remain imported; no local reconstruction or independent review of those foundations is claimed.

Sources