Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External exact extension by zero for module sheaves

PDF p. 7: Zariski locality; PDF p. 15: Localization diagram

Statement

For an open subspace v:V↪X of a ringed space, module extension by zero v! is an exact additive functor left adjoint to exact restriction v∗. Its stalk is the given module stalk at points of V and zero outside V, and v∗v!=id. Assuming the Axiom of Choice and fixed suitable universes for the derived constructions, applying both functors degreewise to complexes preserves quasi-isomorphisms and mapping cones, so they induce actual exact functors on the sheaf-derived infinity-localizations for these arbitrary ringed spaces. Their ordinary natural unit/counit maps induce natural transformations there.

Source contract

Given: A ringed space and an open subspace with restricted structure sheaf; for enhancements, Choice and suitable fixed universes.

Goal: Supply an actual chain-level functor for the supported-category excision argument.

[F1] Stacks Definition 6.31.5 and Lemma 6.31.8 supply module extension by zero, its adjunction, stalks and restriction identity.

[A1] Choice is retained for the Grothendieck-module derived enhancement, not for an additional stalkwise step. The Axiom of Choice

[F2] Stacks §20.32 opening paragraphs and Lemma 20.32.8 supply exactness and the degreewise derived construction. Derived enhancements of module sheaves on ringed spaces specifies the infinity-localization and exactness of induced functors.

External input

Import the sheaf results [F1]–[F2]. The enhanced conclusion follows by the universal property of the supplied localization: the actual degreewise functors send quasi-isomorphisms to quasi-isomorphisms and commute with zero and cones. No claim is made that extension by zero preserves every quasi-coherent or perfect object; the following local support lemma proves preservation on precisely the subcategories where it is used.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

The Stacks Project, Sheaves on Spaces · Definition 6.31.5(5)–(6); Lemma 6.31.8(2)–(4); Lemma 6.31.12

For an open subspace j:V→X of a ringed space, extension by zero j_! on sheaves of modules is left adjoint to restriction, has the original stalks on V and zero stalks off V, and j^*j_!=id.

Hypotheses: Any ringed space and open subspace with restricted structure sheaf. This concerns module sheaves, not extension by the empty set on sheaves of sets.

Reading limits: Read full module definition, Lemma 6.31.8 and Lemma 6.31.12, including the source’s explicit omitted-proof markings. Stalk formula and adjunction are imported as stated.

The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves · §20.32 opening paragraphs; Lemma 20.32.8

Restriction and module extension by zero are exact and induce derived functors by applying them degreewise to any complex; extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction on derived categories.

Hypotheses: Any ringed space and open subspace. No quasi-coherence, constructibility, or finiteness hypothesis is required for these sheaf functors.

Reading limits: Read the opening paragraphs and Lemma 20.32.8 with its displayed proof. Exactness is explicitly stated there with reference to Modules Lemma 17.3.4; that lemma’s underlying proof was not reconstructed. The local proof below checks when j_! preserves perfection; it does not assume it preserves all quasi-coherent sheaves.

Sources