How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External exact extension by zero for module sheaves
PDF p. 7: Zariski locality; PDF p. 15: Localization diagram
Statement
For an open subspace of a ringed space, module extension by zero is an exact additive functor left adjoint to exact restriction . Its stalk is the given module stalk at points of and zero outside , and . Assuming the Axiom of Choice and fixed suitable universes for the derived constructions, applying both functors degreewise to complexes preserves quasi-isomorphisms and mapping cones, so they induce actual exact functors on the sheaf-derived infinity-localizations for these arbitrary ringed spaces. Their ordinary natural unit/counit maps induce natural transformations there.
Source contract
Given: A ringed space and an open subspace with restricted structure sheaf; for enhancements, Choice and suitable fixed universes.
Goal: Supply an actual chain-level functor for the supported-category excision argument.
[F1] Stacks Definition 6.31.5 and Lemma 6.31.8 supply module extension by zero, its adjunction, stalks and restriction identity.
[A1] Choice is retained for the Grothendieck-module derived enhancement, not for an additional stalkwise step. The Axiom of Choice
[F2] Stacks §20.32 opening paragraphs and Lemma 20.32.8 supply exactness and the degreewise derived construction. Derived enhancements of module sheaves on ringed spaces specifies the infinity-localization and exactness of induced functors.
External input
Import the sheaf results [F1]–[F2]. The enhanced conclusion follows by the universal property of the supplied localization: the actual degreewise functors send quasi-isomorphisms to quasi-isomorphisms and commute with zero and cones. No claim is made that extension by zero preserves every quasi-coherent or perfect object; the following local support lemma proves preservation on precisely the subcategories where it is used.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For an open subspace j:V→X of a ringed space, extension by zero j_! on sheaves of modules is left adjoint to restriction, has the original stalks on V and zero stalks off V, and j^*j_!=id.
Hypotheses: Any ringed space and open subspace with restricted structure sheaf. This concerns module sheaves, not extension by the empty set on sheaves of sets.
Reading limits: Read full module definition, Lemma 6.31.8 and Lemma 6.31.12, including the source’s explicit omitted-proof markings. Stalk formula and adjunction are imported as stated.
Restriction and module extension by zero are exact and induce derived functors by applying them degreewise to any complex; extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction on derived categories.
Hypotheses: Any ringed space and open subspace. No quasi-coherence, constructibility, or finiteness hypothesis is required for these sheaf functors.
Reading limits: Read the opening paragraphs and Lemma 20.32.8 with its displayed proof. Exactness is explicitly stated there with reference to Modules Lemma 17.3.4; that lemma’s underlying proof was not reconstructed. The local proof below checks when j_! preserves perfection; it does not assume it preserves all quasi-coherent sheaves.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Sheaves on Spaces · Definition 6.31.5(5)–(6); Lemma 6.31.8(2)–(4); Lemma 6.31.12
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves · §20.32 opening paragraphs; Lemma 20.32.8