How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External normality and perfect-field smooth-locus inputs
PDF p. 15: Theorem6.7: rank-three Bertini functional
Statement
Import the two source results recorded above: Noetherian normal schemes decompose into their finitely many clopen integral normal components and satisfy ; reduced finite-type schemes over a perfect field have identical regular and smooth loci, and that locus is open. Here codimension of an irreducible closed subset with generic point is , as in the cited Serre-condition convention.
Source contract
Given: A Noetherian normal scheme; for the smooth-locus assertion a reduced locally algebraic scheme over a perfect field.
Goal: Import the exact geometric consequences of normality used before constructing parameters.
[F1] Stacks Lemma28.7.5 and Lemma28.12.5 give decomposition and .
[F2] Stacks Lemma33.25.8 gives the stated equality and openness over a perfect field.
External input
Import [F1]–[F2] with their exact hypotheses and reading limits. The five local lemmas apply these foundations and carry their perfectness/Noetherian conditions; they do not purport to prove the whole normality criterion or geometric-regularity theory.
Depends on
- The Stacks Project, normal components and Serre normality criterion · Lemma28.7.5 (0357), complete statement/proof; also Section28.12, Lemma28.12.5, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/033P
- The Stacks Project, regular and smooth loci over perfect fields · Lemma33.25.8 and its complete proof; Lemmas33.25.3–33.25.4 for smoothness/regularity context.
Used by · 6
- Bertini functional with finite smooth zero locus
- Bertini curve functional with a prescribed avoidance locus
- Normal affine threefolds have controlled nonsmooth strata
- A rank-two family avoids each prescribed codimension-two locus
- Componentwise curve construction and the scope of global irreducibility
- Normal dimension strata and the actual residue class model
Dependency tree · 1 level
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.
External dependencies
A normal scheme whose quasi-compact opens have finitely many irreducible components is a disjoint union of integral normal schemes. A locally Noetherian normal scheme has Serre condition(R1).
Hypotheses: The component decomposition needs the stated local finiteness of components, satisfied by a Noetherian scheme; the Serre criterion is locally Noetherian. No characteristic restriction.
Reading limits: Read the actual full Lemma28.7.5 and proof and the actual Section28.12 definition of(R1), codimension convention, and Lemma28.12.5 with its one-line proof reference. The commutative-algebra proof cited by that criterion was not newly reconstructed.
For a reduced locally algebraic scheme over a perfect field, its smooth and regular loci coincide and form a dense open subscheme.
Hypotheses: Perfect field and reduced locally algebraic scheme. Algebraically closed k is perfect; normal schemes here are reduced and finite type. This assertion is not extended to imperfect fields.
Reading limits: Read the full indicated statement and printed proof, including its exact perfect-field hypothesis. Also read the section warning about nonperfect fields and positive-characteristic differential criteria. No claim to reconstruct all cited geometric-regularity foundations.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, normal components and Serre normality criterion · Lemma28.7.5 (0357), complete statement/proof; also Section28.12, Lemma28.12.5, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/033P
- The Stacks Project, regular and smooth loci over perfect fields · Lemma33.25.8 and its complete proof; Lemmas33.25.3–33.25.4 for smoothness/regularity context.