Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Line bundles and first motivic Chern class

PDF p. 1: Introduction, second paragraph; PDF p. 2: After Theorem A

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the site-size and universe bounds required for the weight-one comparison, Nisnevich cohomology and perfect-complex determinant below. Let k be a field and X a quasi-compact quasi-separated k-scheme. The first motivic Chern class gives a natural group isomorphism c1:Pic⁡(X)→∼Hmot2,1(X,Z). Consequently two line bundles on X are isomorphic exactly when their first motivic Chern classes agree, and every class in the displayed motivic cohomology group is the first class of a line bundle.

A line bundle is a Zariski locally free OX-module of rank one; Pic⁡(X) is the group of its isomorphism classes under tensor product. The group Hmot2,1(X,Z) is degree-two cohomology of the supplied weight-one motivic complex. The map c1 is the supplied first motivic Chern class on an actual line bundle. Its inverse first applies the inverse of the weight-one comparison to obtain a class in HNis1(X,Gm) and then takes the line bundle descended from the corresponding frame torsor. Here Gm is the sheaf of invertible regular functions on the small Nisnevich site.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a quasi-compact quasi-separated k-scheme X, the Axiom of Choice and the site-size and universe bounds in the cited suppliers.

Goal: Prove that the actual first motivic Chern class is the stated natural bijective group homomorphism, with the specified inverse.

[F1]

The natural weight-one comparison induces an isomorphism HNis1(X,Gm)→Hmot2,1(X,Z) under Choice and its stated site-size bounds. Motivic weight one

[F2]

Under Choice and its specified small-site and universe bounds, the frame-torsor construction identifies Pic⁡(X) with HNis1(X,Gm) as a group; descent from frames gives the inverse. Units and Picard groups in Nisnevich degree zero and one

[F3]

For every qcqs scheme over a field, under the stated Choice and universe bounds, the actual first motivic Chern class on a bundle agrees with the composite of its determinant and the weight-one orientation γX:Pic⁡(X)→Hmot2,1(X,Z). This orientation is the isomorphism obtained from the weight-one comparison and the Picard identification. First Chern class factors through determinant

[F4]

The determinant of a bundle agrees with its exterior determinant. In rank one the top exterior power is the bundle itself, canonically. Determinant descends on the actual perfect K zero

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed as required by the cited cohomological and determinant constructions. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

technique · Identify the first Chern class with a composite of the frame-torsor and weight-one isomorphisms
1.1F1F2F5

By [F2], a line bundle class maps to the class of its frame torsor, and this defines a group isomorphism from Pic⁡(X) to HNis1(X,Gm). Compose it with the isomorphism of [F1]. The resulting map γX is a group isomorphism, with inverse given by the two inverse constructions in reverse order.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Let L be a line bundle. Its determinant is canonically L by [F4]. Applying the actual bundle-class comparison in [F3] therefore gives c1(L)=γX([L]). Thus the map of step 1.1 is precisely the stated first Chern class, including its orientation.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

Since c1=γX, it is a natural group isomorphism. Its injectivity says that equal first classes give the same Picard class, hence isomorphic line bundles; its surjectivity gives a line bundle representing each motivic class. The inverse is the one described in the statement by steps 1.1 and 2.1. Naturality follows from the naturality of the two supplied comparison maps.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources