How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First Chern class factors through determinant
PDF p. 8: Proposition3.2, perfect-complex first class and determinant
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed compatible site-size and universe bounds required by the supplied perfect K-theory, derived-section and weight-one constructions. Let be any field and any qcqs -scheme. For the specified perfect-complex spectral , the first motivic Chern class is the actual rank-reduced first-layer map constructed by rank reduction, and it factors naturally as The first arrow is the extended perfect-complex determinant and the second is the actual EM weight-one orientation. For a line-filtered bundle its determinant is the tensor product of the line factors and the first classes add. On actual and virtual vector-bundle classes this agrees with their supplied projective-relation and total-series first coefficients. No global equality of vector-bundle K zero with perfect K zero is assumed.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Assume the Axiom of Choice as formulated in The Axiom of Choice and the compatible site-size and universe bounds in the Statement. They are inherited through the all-perfect first-layer construction in [F2] at step 1.1 and its determinant and bundle comparisons in [F1]–[F3] at steps 1.1–2.1.
Determinant descends on the actual perfect K zero constructs the natural determinant on exactly the specified perfect .
Canonical first motivic class on every perfect K zero class supplies the actual first-layer class on every perfect class and the displayed factorization. Motivic weight one identifies its second arrow as a natural isomorphism.
Agreement with the existing projective-relation and virtual bundle first classes identifies the existing bundle and virtual first classes and proves the line-factor formula.
Proof
Given: and perfect class as stated.
Goal: Establish the full qcqs arbitrary-field proposition and its existing-class compatibility.
Use [F1] for the first arrow and the canonical orientation of [F2] for the second. By [F2] their composite is exactly defined from the actual first EM layer, on every class of the specified . This proves the full factorization, including perfect complexes lacking global bounded vector-bundle representatives.
Apply [F3] to actual/virtual bundle classes and line filtrations. Their first classes and determinant tensor products are the same classes in the composite of step 1.1. Both arrows are natural by [F1]–[F2], so this is a natural factorization on all qcqs schemes over every field, as asserted.
Depends on
Used by · 10
- Line bundles and first motivic Chern class
- First projection is first Chern class
- Rank and determinant on the second piece
- Second Chern additivity on the second piece
- Reduced bundle class identities
- First-class matching and explicit perfect Chern arithmetic
- Apply the actual perfect Cartan identity to the second image
- The reduced universal bundle calculation identifies the second projection
- Actual second-stage comparison on every qcqs field-scheme
- The first two perfect Chern classes vanish on the third image piece in full scope
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Fasel–Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · Proposition3.2, p8