How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Berge girth at least three forces linearity
Statement
If a finite hypergraph has Berge girth at least three, then it is linear: any two distinct hyperedges have at most one common vertex.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
By Berge cycles, incidence graphs and girth, a Berge cycle of length two consists of two distinct hyperedges and two distinct vertices , each belonging to both hyperedges. Berge girth is the least cycle length, or if there is no cycle, and linearity means that any two distinct hyperedges have at most one common vertex.
Proof
Given: A finite hypergraph of Berge girth at least three.
Goal: The hypergraph is linear.
If two distinct hyperedges had two distinct common vertices, those edges and vertices would form a Berge cycle of length two: each vertex lies in the intersection of the two edges, as required for both cyclic indices.
Such a cycle would make the Berge girth at most two, contrary to the given lower bound. Hence no two distinct hyperedges have two distinct common vertices, so the hypergraph is linear.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.