How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Berge cycles, incidence graphs and girth
Definition
A finite hypergraph is a pair where is a finite set and is a set of subsets of ; its members are hyperedges. Its incidence graph is the finite simple graph whose vertex set is and whose edges are exactly the pairs for which . Its two displayed vertex sets are the parts of the graph: every graph edge joins one part to the other.
A Berge cycle of length consists of distinct hyperedges and distinct vertices such that for every , with indices modulo . The Berge girth is the least length of a Berge cycle, or if no Berge cycle exists; is greater than every integer. The hypergraph is linear if any two distinct hyperedges have at most one common vertex.
Definition references
Justification
The tags and distinguish the two kinds of node even when a vertex is itself a hyperedge. The two parts and the incidence-edge set are finite; each incidence edge has two distinct endpoints and is an unordered pair, so this construction is a finite simple graph. An -uniform hypergraph in the cited definition is a special case of the finite hypergraphs defined here. The possible cycle lengths lie between and both and , so a nonempty set of possible lengths has a least element; the separate convention covers the empty case. Linearity is a definite condition on pairs of hyperedges.
Depends on
- r-uniform hypergraphs and complete balanced r-partite r-graphs K⁽ʳ⁾_s,…,s
- A finite simple graph is a finite vertex set together with a set of two-element vertex subsets
- The Cartesian product A × B := { z ∈ P(P(A ∪ B)) : ∃ a ∈ A ∃ b ∈ B z = (a,b) }
- Maria Axenovich and Annette Karrer, High girth hypergraphs with unavoidable monochromatic or rainbow edges, arXiv:1607.06600v2 · Section 1, cycle and girth paragraph immediately before Theorem 1
Used by · 12
- Hypergraph terminology used in Construction 1
- Copies on hyperedges are induced
- Block exclusion in the high-girth base graph
- Finite high-girth hypergraphs with no weak k-colouring
- Linear realisations preserve induced pieces
- Berge girth at least three forces linearity
- Small edge supports in a high-girth hypergraph
- Two-connected subgraphs stay in one incidence-forest piece
- Small 2-connected subgraphs localise in high-girth pieces
- A Berge cycle bounds the union of its hyperedges
- Finite edge-union sparsity excludes short Berge cycles
- The finite graph boundary gives two-uniform witnesses
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
A hypergraph cycle of length $s\geq2$ uses distinct edges $e_0,\ldots,e_{s-1}$ and distinct vertices $x_0,\ldots,x_{s-1}$ with $x_i\in e_i\cap e_{i+1}$ cyclically; girth is the shortest cycle length, or infinity if there is no cycle.
Hypotheses: Hypergraph with distinct hyperedges and cycle vertices; indices are taken modulo the cycle length.
Reading limits: The Section 1 cycle and girth paragraph was read. The source is used for that convention, not for the incidence-graph construction or a proof of another result.
Sources
- Maria Axenovich and Annette Karrer, High girth hypergraphs with unavoidable monochromatic or rainbow edges, arXiv:1607.06600v2 · Section 1, cycle and girth paragraph immediately before Theorem 1